Skip to content

BUILD-10739 Cache cleanup - docs#46

Merged
mikolaj-matuszny-ext-sonarsource merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
feat/mmatuszny/BUILD-10739-cache-cleanup-docs
Mar 19, 2026
Merged

BUILD-10739 Cache cleanup - docs#46
mikolaj-matuszny-ext-sonarsource merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
feat/mmatuszny/BUILD-10739-cache-cleanup-docs

Conversation

@mikolaj-matuszny-ext-sonarsource
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sonar-review-alpha
Copy link

sonar-review-alpha bot commented Mar 19, 2026

Summary

Updates cache cleanup documentation and runner configuration. Changes the cleanup job runner from github-ubuntu-latest-s to sonar-xs, and adds a new table row clarifying how to delete cache keys for a specific branch using both the branch name and cache key parameters.

What reviewers should know

This is a small docs-focused PR. Start with the table change (line ~271) which adds a new use case row. The runner change (line ~249) appears to be infrastructure configuration—verify this aligns with the project's runner setup if unfamiliar with sonar-xs.


  • Generate Walkthrough
  • Generate Diagram

🗣️ Give feedback

@mikolaj-matuszny-ext-sonarsource mikolaj-matuszny-ext-sonarsource force-pushed the feat/mmatuszny/BUILD-10739-cache-cleanup-docs branch from dab2b09 to 14c55d1 Compare March 19, 2026 08:10
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link

@sonar-review-alpha sonar-review-alpha bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conclusion: Clean docs-only PR. The new table row correctly documents the branch+key combination use case, and the runner label change looks intentional.

🗣️ Give feedback

@sonarqube-cloud-us
Copy link

@mikolaj-matuszny-ext-sonarsource mikolaj-matuszny-ext-sonarsource merged commit 52e7096 into master Mar 19, 2026
14 checks passed
@mikolaj-matuszny-ext-sonarsource mikolaj-matuszny-ext-sonarsource deleted the feat/mmatuszny/BUILD-10739-cache-cleanup-docs branch March 19, 2026 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants