Worked on email templete

[Santan24]

No description provided.

[kunalvats]

Better to use any credentials used in config files or default.json. Can be used at multiple places and will have to update at one place only, if needed.

[Santan24]

Okay

[kunalvats]

Should try-catch the whole function, and return the error. Anything could fail not just the mail.

[kunalvats]

Should be /survey. Filename case should match always.

[github-advanced-security]

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

The best way to fix this problem is to ensure that the email value used in MongoDB queries is always interpreted as a literal value and not as a query object. There are two safe approaches:

1. Use the $eq operator in the query: { email: { $eq: email } }, which ensures that the value is not interpreted as a query object.
2. Explicitly check that email is a string before constructing the query object.

We will edit controllers/auth.js at line 168 in the login function. We'll change the call from:

const user = await User.findOne({ email });

to:

const user = await User.findOne({ email: { $eq: email } });

Optionally, for extra safety, you can add a type check for email. But using $eq is sufficient and idiomatic.

No additional imports or dependencies are needed.

---

To fix the vulnerability, we should validate that _id from req.body is a string (or a valid MongoDB ObjectId, if required by your schema) and not an object that could be used for query manipulation. This can be done by checking typeof _id === "string" or, for better security and compatibility, by using the ObjectId.isValid helper from the mongodb or mongoose library and converting to ObjectId. Alternatively, you could use the $eq operator in the query to ensure the user input is interpreted as a literal value.

Best fix:
In the block for updateProfile, add a check:

• If _id is not a string (and optionally not a valid ObjectId), return a 400 error response.
• Otherwise, proceed as normal using _id safely.

Required changes:
Add a type check on _id at the start of the updateProfile function, before passing it to .findOneAndUpdate. If possible, validate it as an ObjectId. (As shown code uses Mongoose, so you can use mongoose.Types.ObjectId.isValid if ObjectId is used, else keep a string check.)

---

To fix the vulnerability, only a predefined list of fields should be updatable by the user. This can be accomplished by creating an explicit whitelist (array) of allowed fields for User updates, extracting just those fields from req.body, and then using that filtered object for the update operation.

• Add an array of allowed profile fields (e.g., ['username', 'email', 'phoneNo']—add fields as fits your model).
• Extract only these fields from req.body, e.g., via .reduce or a library like lodash.pick—but since we cannot add new dependencies unnecessarily, use only plain JavaScript here.
• Use the filtered object in { $set: filteredBody } in the update operation.
• Optionally, reject any requests where the body attempts to update fields not in the whitelist.

All changes are to be made within the updateProfile function in controllers/auth.js.

To resolve this issue, a rate limiting middleware should be applied to the /activate/:token endpoint in routes/auth.js. The most common solution is to use the popular express-rate-limit package. The process involves:

• Importing express-rate-limit at the top of the file.
• Instantiating a rate limit middleware (e.g., restrict to a reasonable number of requests per time window).
• Applying the middleware to the /activate/:token route, ensuring only this route is affected.
• No changes to the underlying handler (verifyAccount) or to unrelated routes.

This fix does not change existing functionality provided by the route handler, and instead adds a layer of protection for the flagged endpoint.

---

To address the missing rate-limiting concern with minimal impact on existing functionality, we will introduce the well-known express-rate-limit middleware for the affected routes. We'll install and import express-rate-limit and then configure a rate limiter specifically for password-related endpoints (or, optionally, for all endpoints if that's desired). We'll apply the rate limiter only to those routes (like /changepassword/:token, /resetlink, /signup, etc.) within routes/auth.js. This will provide targeted protection against brute-force and denial-of-service attacks without overly restricting normal usage.

Import express-rate-limit at the top of the file. Then, create an instance of the rate limiter (e.g., limit to 5 requests per IP per 15 minutes—this is customizable). Next, attach the limiter as middleware to the /changepassword/:token route (and optionally other auth routes if desired). Only these changes are needed in routes/auth.js to address the finding.

---

To fix this issue, you should employ a rate-limiting middleware for the route in question. The most established and effective way to do this in an Express application is to use the express-rate-limit package. You should add an import for express-rate-limit, define a limiter (for example, allowing only 5 update attempts per minute per IP), and then apply it as middleware to the /updateprofile route. To minimize impact on the rest of the code, only the relevant import, limiter definition, and the route handler line need to be modified or extended.

• Add const rateLimit = require('express-rate-limit'); near the top.
• Define a updateProfileLimiter (e.g., allowing 5 attempts per minute) after the router declaration.
• Apply the limiter to the /updateprofile route, e.g.:
  router.put("/updateprofile", updateProfileLimiter, updateProfile);

These changes should all be made within routes/auth.js.

---

To fix the issue, we will apply a rate-limiting middleware to the /createsurvey route. The most common approach in Express is to use the express-rate-limit package, which can be installed and configured to set a maximum number of requests per time period. We will:

• Import express-rate-limit at the top of the file.
• Instantiate the rate limiter with appropriate parameters (e.g., 100 requests per 15 minutes per IP).
• Apply the rate limiter to the /createsurvey route, placing it immediately before the protect middleware.
• Only edit code shown within routes/survey.js.
• Do not affect other routes unless they are equally vulnerable and highlighted.

Required steps:

• Add the rate limiter import and definition.
• Update the /createsurvey route to include the rate limiter middleware.

---

To fix the missing rate limiting, a rate-limiting middleware should be added to the affected route(s). The canonical approach in Express is to use the popular express-rate-limit package, which can throttle requests by client as configured. To minimize code changes and avoid altering existing logic, we should import and configure express-rate-limit within this file, and apply the middleware specifically to the endpoints needing rate protection.
Concretely:

• Install and import express-rate-limit.
• Configure a rate limiter (e.g., maximum 100 requests per 15 minutes per IP).
• Apply the rate limiter middleware to the /response/yes/:id route (and, ideally, also to similar /response/no/:id route to cover all survey responses).
• Only modify code in routes/survey.js, as shown.

---

To fix the missing rate limiting vulnerability in the given Express router, we should add a rate-limiting middleware to the specific route /response/no/:id. The recommended approach is to use the widely used express-rate-limit package. We should:

• Add the required import for express-rate-limit.
• Define a rate limiter (e.g., allow a reasonable number of requests per window per IP).
• Apply the limiter specifically to the vulnerable route, rather than all routes, to minimally change existing behaviour.
  All code changes should be made within routes/survey.js, at the top for imports and in the routing section for middleware application.

---

To fix this, we should add a rate-limiting middleware to the /getSurvey route to restrict the number of requests allowed per IP/user within a certain time window. The most common and well-supported package for this in Express is express-rate-limit. Import express-rate-limit, define a limiter (e.g., max 100 requests per 15 minutes is reasonable), and apply it to the /getSurvey route.

The following changes are needed:

• Add express-rate-limit import at the top of the file.
• Instantiate a rate limiter with appropriate configuration.
• Apply the rate limiter middleware to the /getSurvey route as the first argument.

No changes are needed to existing route handlers except for updating the route definition to include the middleware.

---