Changes in doc in case of encrypted password - key to be taken as a p… #6137
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ath and not directly as part of command
sumoanema
requested review from
a team,
JV0812,
amee-sumo,
jpipkin1,
kimsauce and
mafsumo
as code owners
sumoanema
added
do-not-merge
jpipkin1
approved these changes
Dec 22, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…ath and not directly as part of command
Purpose of this pull request
This pull request is to change doc in a specific case where encrypted password and key were being passed in the same command of the script. There was a customer issue pointing to this. We have fixed the script to now accept a path to the file with key (permission for which could be set based on user preference).
Select the type of change
Ticket (if applicable)