Conversation
Greptile OverviewGreptile SummaryTransforms the essay pipeline into a "Battle Arena" where multiple AI models compete by writing, reviewing, and revising essays, then evaluating each other's work through two test modes: scoring-test (1-10 ratings) and 1v1 (head-to-head comparisons). Key Changes
Issues Found
Confidence Score: 4/5
Important Files ChangedFile Analysis
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI as index.ts
participant AI as aiClient.ts
participant FS as fileUtils.ts
participant Models as OpenRouter Models
User->>CLI: Run with --test=scoring-test or --test=1v1
CLI->>User: Display test type selection
User->>CLI: Confirm test execution
Note over CLI,FS: Phase 1: Essay Generation
CLI->>FS: initArenaRun(testType)
FS->>FS: Create results/{testType}/{timestamp}/
loop For each model
CLI->>AI: generateEssay(model, topic)
AI->>Models: Generate essay via OpenRouter
Models-->>AI: Essay text + usage data
AI-->>CLI: EssayResult
CLI->>FS: writeEssay(topicDir, model, essay)
end
Note over CLI,FS: Phase 2: Feedback Generation
loop For each reviewer model
loop For each other author model
CLI->>AI: reviewEssay(reviewer, essay, topic)
AI->>Models: Review essay
Models-->>AI: Feedback text + usage
AI-->>CLI: ReviewResult
CLI->>FS: writeFeedback(topicDir, reviewer, author, feedback)
end
end
Note over CLI,FS: Phase 3: Revisions
loop For each author model
loop For each reviewer's feedback
CLI->>AI: reviseEssay(author, topic, essay, feedback)
AI->>Models: Revise essay
Models-->>AI: Revised text + usage
AI-->>CLI: RevisionResult
CLI->>FS: writeRevision(topicDir, author, reviewer, revision)
end
end
alt Scoring Test Mode
Note over CLI,FS: Phase 4a: Scoring
loop For each judge model
loop For each essay (original + revised)
CLI->>AI: scoreEssay(judge, essay, topic)
AI->>Models: Score essay 1-10
Models-->>AI: Score + justification + usage
AI-->>CLI: ScoreResult (parsed from text)
end
end
CLI->>CLI: calculateScoringRankings(scores)
CLI->>FS: writeResultsJson(baseDir, results)
CLI->>FS: writeSummary(baseDir, results)
else 1v1 Test Mode
Note over CLI,FS: Phase 4b: Head-to-Head Comparisons
loop For each judge model
loop For each pair of essays
CLI->>AI: compareEssays(judge, essayA, essayB, topic)
AI->>Models: Compare essays A vs B
Models-->>AI: Winner (A/B/tie) + reasoning + usage
AI-->>CLI: CompareResult (parsed from text)
CLI->>FS: writeComparison(topicDir, judge, essayA, essayB, winner)
end
end
CLI->>CLI: calculateOneVsOneRankings(comparisons)
CLI->>FS: writeOneVsOneResultsJson(baseDir, results)
CLI->>FS: writeOneVsOneSummary(baseDir, results)
end
CLI->>User: Display final rankings and cost summary
|
| "The ethics of artificial intelligence", | ||
| "How social media reshapes human connection", | ||
| // "The value of slow living in a fast world", | ||
| // "Why we should embrace uncertainty", | ||
| // "The hidden costs of convenience", | ||
| // "What makes a good explanation", | ||
| // "The relationship between creativity and constraint", | ||
| // "Why some ideas spread and others don't", | ||
| "the negative impacts on society from artificial intelligence", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: duplicate topic "the negative impacts on society from artificial intelligence" is similar to line 22 "The ethics of artificial intelligence"
| "The ethics of artificial intelligence", | |
| "How social media reshapes human connection", | |
| // "The value of slow living in a fast world", | |
| // "Why we should embrace uncertainty", | |
| // "The hidden costs of convenience", | |
| // "What makes a good explanation", | |
| // "The relationship between creativity and constraint", | |
| // "Why some ideas spread and others don't", | |
| "the negative impacts on society from artificial intelligence", | |
| "The ethics of artificial intelligence", | |
| "How social media reshapes human connection", | |
| ] as const; |
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: constants.ts
Line: 22:30
Comment:
**logic:** duplicate topic "the negative impacts on society from artificial intelligence" is similar to line 22 "The ethics of artificial intelligence"
```suggestion
"The ethics of artificial intelligence",
"How social media reshapes human connection",
] as const;
```
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
aiClient.ts
Outdated
| const scoreMatch = result.text.match(/Score:\s*(\d+(?:\.\d+)?)\s*\/\s*10/i); | ||
| const score = scoreMatch?.[1] ? parseFloat(scoreMatch[1]) : 5; // Default to 5 if parsing fails |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: regex parsing fragile - if model outputs "Score: 7.5 / 10" (with spaces) or "Score 8/10" (no colon), parsing fails silently and defaults to 5
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: aiClient.ts
Line: 164:165
Comment:
**logic:** regex parsing fragile - if model outputs "Score: 7.5 / 10" (with spaces) or "Score 8/10" (no colon), parsing fails silently and defaults to 5
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
aiClient.ts
Outdated
| const winnerMatch = result.text.match(/Winner:\s*(A|B|Tie)/i); | ||
| let winner: "A" | "B" | "tie" = "tie"; | ||
| if (winnerMatch) { | ||
| const parsed = winnerMatch[1]!.toUpperCase(); | ||
| if (parsed === "A") winner = "A"; | ||
| else if (parsed === "B") winner = "B"; | ||
| else winner = "tie"; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: winner parsing defaults to "tie" on parse failure - should handle parse errors explicitly since ties should be rare
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: aiClient.ts
Line: 224:231
Comment:
**style:** winner parsing defaults to "tie" on parse failure - should handle parse errors explicitly since ties should be rare
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
No description provided.