Skip to content

Conversation

@thorstenl312
Copy link

TOC updated for J721S2, J742S2 and J784S4 to include Demo User Guides

Video Streaming section added to include hardware accelerated video streaming for YouTube, Vimeo and HTML5 on Chromium for supported boards. Software accelerated video streaming is included for YouTube, Vimeo and HTML5 on Chromium for boards that don't support hardware acceleration.

@b-brnich
Copy link
Contributor

Update commit subject to match others seen in this tree

@b-brnich
Copy link
Contributor

I would also think it good to add a note saying that only yuv420 8bit encoded videos will work with HW accelerated decode so customers are aware of limitations. if they use a different format, it could fall back to software decoding leading to higher performance and confusion

@thorstenl312 thorstenl312 marked this pull request as draft October 22, 2025 19:27
@thorstenl312 thorstenl312 marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2025 19:58
@thorstenl312 thorstenl312 marked this pull request as draft October 23, 2025 15:49
@thorstenl312 thorstenl312 marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2025 18:45
@b-brnich
Copy link
Contributor

is there anyway to know if the video from vimeo is not going to be h.264. I see that they support HEVC and AV1, but commonly it will be H.264. Since the others are possible depending on the video, maybe the statement above should be edited. "Vimeo is supported by hardware acceleration through the V4L2 decoder" could be interpreted as any video from vimeo is expected to work through HW acceleration, which isn't true. Right?

Also in the tables, remove the line for the platform row and center the name in there

Thorsten Lannynd added 2 commits October 23, 2025 14:17
Added documentation for Chromium browser video streaming capabilities.
Documented hardware acceleration via V4L2 decoder with Wave5 hardware for
HTML5, YouTube, and Vimeo streaming. Included H.264 hardware acceleration
details and performance benchmarks comparing hardware versus software
decoding across supported platforms.

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Lannynd <t-lannynd@ti.com>
Added Demo User Guides section to the table of contents for J721S2, J742S2, and J784S4 platform configurations.
This ensures the demo guides are accessible in the generated documentation.

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Lannynd <t-lannynd@ti.com>
Copy link
Member

@cshilwant cshilwant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR seems to be an enhancement to chromium user guide but tends to add following sections in J7 platforms. Is that intended?

linux/Demo_User_Guides/TI_Apps_Launcher_User_Guide
linux/Demo_User_Guides/Seva_Store

@thorstenl312
Copy link
Author

This PR seems to be an enhancement to chromium user guide but tends to add following sections in J7 platforms. Is that intended?

linux/Demo_User_Guides/TI_Apps_Launcher_User_Guide
linux/Demo_User_Guides/Seva_Store

Yes, AM68 and AM69 both have those pages included and the J7 equivalents should match. They were added together since the J7 boards were missing the entire Demo_User_Guides section. I can seperate it into two PRs, one strictly for chromium and the other for the rest, if needed.

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member

@cshilwant do all PSDK platforms ship that launcher, or is it conditionally enabled? I remember seeing J* ifdef logic in the tree way back when, but I haven't kept up with it.

@cshilwant
Copy link
Member

@cshilwant do all PSDK platforms ship that launcher, or is it conditionally enabled? I remember seeing J* ifdef logic in the tree way back when, but I haven't kept up with it.

In meta-tisdk, for Jacinto platforms..I see ti-apps-launcher enabled for platforms which use the foundational override [0]
@sinha-shreyash / @aniket-l can you comment on which all Jacinto platforms use the foundational override

[0] - https://github.com/TexasInstruments/meta-tisdk/blob/scarthgap/meta-ti-foundational/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisdk-addons.bbappend

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants