Skip to content

Conversation

@prokophanzl
Copy link

No description provided.

including it in your source files like you would any other header, you'll
be good to go! (Just make sure to use a relatively modern compiler)

We have this project tested and provably working with
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this line was fine as was but I'm alright with changing it 🤷 tho I prefer "works with (a compiler)" over "works for (a compiler)"

Copy link
Owner

@Toaster192 Toaster192 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely a step in the right direction tho there are some changes I'd still make


## Integrated transpiler
For testing, we also provide C to Č and reverse transpiler in the file
For testing, we also provide C to Č and a reverse transpiler in the file
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here I think the article suggests that we provide "C to Č" and "a reverse transpiler" instead of "C to Č and reverse" - transpiler. Do you see it the same way?

Perhaps there are better ways to phrase this like
we provide a transpiler for both C to Č and Č to C
we provide a transpiler between C and Č that works both ways
Idk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants