Shangcloud sdk

[Rundll86]

已修复eslint

[YearnstudioYangyi]

但是这个项目并非是一个简单的云变量，它拥有与TW原版云变量不同的机制（可以在确保安全的情况下跨社区同步，并且可以自动隔离不同用户的数据，不需要开发者考虑，即同名变量不同用户完全隔离）。
并且我们会逐步添加本地化

However, this project is not a simple cloud variable; it has a mechanism different from the original TW cloud variable (it can synchronize across communities safely and can automatically isolate different users' data without requiring developers to consider this, meaning that variables with the same name are completely isolated for different users). We will also gradually add localization.

[PPPDUD]

If this extension communicates your IP address to servers subject to the jurisdiction of the Chinese government, you have lost my support.

[YearnstudioYangyi]

为什么执着于中国政府的问题？ 我想无论哪个国家的政府，只要不涉及敏感话题都不会出现问题的，而这是编程社区，您肯定也不希望变成乱哄哄的样子。在绝大多数情况下我们无权透漏您的IP地址给政府，我想如果您还记得这是一个编程社区而非政治社区，就不会有这种顾虑 Why are you so fixated on issues with the Chinese government? I believe that any government, as long as it doesn't involve sensitive topics, would not pose a problem, and this is a programming community; you certainly wouldn't want it to become chaotic. In the vast majority of cases, we do not have the authority to disclose your IP address to the government. I think if you remember this is a programming community rather than a political one, you wouldn't have such concerns.

…

---Original--- From: ***@***.***> Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2025 00:06 AM To: ***@***.***>; Cc: ***@***.******@***.***>; Subject: Re: [TurboWarp/extensions] Shangcloud sdk (PR #2213) PPPDUD left a comment (TurboWarp/extensions#2213) If this extension communicates your IP address to servers subject to the jurisdiction of the Chinese government, you have lost my support. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Brackets-Coder]

If this is only available for use in China then it likely won't be merged, we have an international community that all want access to every extension on the gallery...

[YearnstudioYangyi]

非常抱歉，我貌似并没有理解您的意思。
您说只能在中国使用，我似乎并没有对国外IP做出任何限制，并且隐私政策也继续生效。国际化也正在逐步添加，后续我们还会追加全球CDN。
我不是很理解您说的“只能在中国使用”是什么意思，如果可以，请您告诉我们。

I am very sorry, but I seem to have not understood your meaning. You said it can only be used in China, but I don't seem to have imposed any restrictions on foreign IPs, and the privacy policy continues to be effective. Internationalization is also being gradually added, and we will be adding a global CDN in the future. I don't quite understand what you mean by "only available for use in China". If possible, please let us know.

[YearnstudioYangyi]

如果各位是看到了网站底部的备案号，请不用担心这一点，备案只针对于国内，并且并不意味着网站时时刻刻受到中国政府的审查，如果没有违规行为，是不会干涉网站正常运营的。我们进行备案只是为了加快中国大陆的访问速度。

If you have seen the ICP Filing at the bottom of the website, please do not worry about it. The ICP Filing is only for domestic purposes and does not mean that the website is under constant scrutiny by the Chinese government. If there are no violations, there will be no interference with the normal operation of the website. We are filing the record solely to speed up access in mainland China.

[PPPDUD]

如果各位是看到了网站底部的备案号，请不用担心这一点，备案只针对于国内，并且并不意味着网站时时刻刻受到中国政府的审查，如果没有违规行为，是不会干涉网站正常运营的。我们进行备案只是为了加快中国大陆的访问速度。

If you have seen the ICP Filing at the bottom of the website, please do not worry about it. The ICP Filing is only for domestic purposes and does not mean that the website is under constant scrutiny by the Chinese government. If there are no violations, there will be no interference with the normal operation of the website. We are filing the record solely to speed up access in mainland China.

为什么执着于中国政府的问题？ 我想无论哪个国家的政府，只要不涉及敏感话题都不会出现问题的，而这是编程社区，您肯定也不希望变成乱哄哄的样子。在绝大多数情况下我们无权透漏您的IP地址给政府，我想如果您还记得这是一个编程社区而非政治社区，就不会有这种顾虑 Why are you so fixated on issues with the Chinese government? I believe that any government, as long as it doesn't involve sensitive topics, would not pose a problem, and this is a programming community; you certainly wouldn't want it to become chaotic. In the vast majority of cases, we do not have the authority to disclose your IP address to the government. I think if you remember this is a programming community rather than a political one, you wouldn't have such concerns.
…
---Original--- From: @.> Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2025 00:06 AM To: @.>; Cc: @.@.>; Subject: Re: [TurboWarp/extensions] Shangcloud sdk (PR #2213) PPPDUD left a comment (TurboWarp/extensions#2213) If this extension communicates your IP address to servers subject to the jurisdiction of the Chinese government, you have lost my support. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

Everything is a sensitive topic if the CCP says it is, and who's there to stop them?

[YearnstudioYangyi]

我重复一遍：不是政治话题中国不会管太多，如果您要把政治话题带到编程社区，我想这不是一个明智的决定

I repeat: China won't intervene too much on non-political topics. If you want to bring political topics into the programming community, I think this is not a wise decision.

[Brackets-Coder]

@CubesterYT what'd'u think

[CubesterYT]

This extension won't be accepted

[Brackets-Coder]

This extension won't be accepted

That's what I thought, and even if the code is fine, I wouldn't merge something controversial enough to cause a debate in a GitHub conversation...

Are we good to close this?

[YearnstudioYangyi]

我理解大家对「和中国关联」的顾虑，但这里存在「技术工具」和「政治叙事」的认知错位：

编程社区的核心是代码/技术，不是舆论阵地——中国政府对纯技术平台的监管逻辑是「保障合规」，而非「无差别管控」；正规商业项目也不会拿用户数据冒险，法律和商业逻辑都不允许。

这个扩展「跨社区同步 + 自动隔离数据」的技术创新，能实实在在帮大家提效，这是 Merge 的核心价值。如果因为「标签偏见」拒掉，对社区是损失。

关于「中国优先」：团队从没限制外国 IP，隐私政策覆盖全球，未来也会加速国际化（加 CDN、多语言）。这是「先本土验证再出海」的商业选择，不是「排外」。
GitHub 是技术社区，决策该回到「技术是否优质」「是否对社区有用」——把「政治顾虑」凌驾于技术价值，才是对社区的伤害。

如果还是担心「中国标签」，团队也可以承诺：把服务器架到海外、做更彻底的数据隔离（当然这会增加成本），但「技术价值」本身不该被「莫须有的政治标签」埋没。

I understand everyone's concerns about 'being associated with China', but there is a cognitive dissonance between 'technical tools' and 'political narratives':The core of the programming community is code/technology, not a battleground for public opinion— the Chinese government's logic for regulating purely technical platforms is 'ensuring compliance', not 'indiscriminate control'; legitimate commercial projects will not risk user data, as both legal and business logic prohibit it.This technological innovation of 'cross-community synchronisation and automatic data isolation' can genuinely help improve efficiency for everyone, which is the core value of Merge. Rejecting it due to 'label bias' would be a loss for the community.Regarding 'China first': the team has never restricted foreign IP, the privacy policy covers the globe, and we will accelerate internationalisation in the future (by adding CDN and multiple languages). This is a business choice of 'validating locally before going overseas', not 'exclusionary'.GitHub is a technical community, and the decision should return to 'whether the technology is of high quality' and 'whether it is useful for the community'— placing 'political concerns' above technological value is what harms the community.If there are still worries about the 'Chinese label', the team can also commit to: relocating servers overseas and implementing more thorough data isolation (though this will increase costs), but the 'technological value' itself should not be buried by 'unfounded political labels'.

[Brackets-Coder]

我理解大家对「和中国关联」的顾虑，但这里存在「技术工具」和「政治叙事」的认知错位：

编程社区的核心是代码/技术，不是舆论阵地——中国政府对纯技术平台的监管逻辑是「保障合规」，而非「无差别管控」；正规商业项目也不会拿用户数据冒险，法律和商业逻辑都不允许。

这个扩展「跨社区同步 + 自动隔离数据」的技术创新，能实实在在帮大家提效，这是 Merge 的核心价值。如果因为「标签偏见」拒掉，对社区是损失。

关于「中国优先」：团队从没限制外国 IP，隐私政策覆盖全球，未来也会加速国际化（加 CDN、多语言）。这是「先本土验证再出海」的商业选择，不是「排外」。 GitHub 是技术社区，决策该回到「技术是否优质」「是否对社区有用」——把「政治顾虑」凌驾于技术价值，才是对社区的伤害。

如果还是担心「中国标签」，团队也可以承诺：把服务器架到海外、做更彻底的数据隔离（当然这会增加成本），但「技术价值」本身不该被「莫须有的政治标签」埋没。

I understand everyone's concerns about 'being associated with China', but there is a cognitive dissonance between 'technical tools' and 'political narratives':The core of the programming community is code/technology, not a battleground for public opinion— the Chinese government's logic for regulating purely technical platforms is 'ensuring compliance', not 'indiscriminate control'; legitimate commercial projects will not risk user data, as both legal and business logic prohibit it.This technological innovation of 'cross-community synchronisation and automatic data isolation' can genuinely help improve efficiency for everyone, which is the core value of Merge. Rejecting it due to 'label bias' would be a loss for the community.Regarding 'China first': the team has never restricted foreign IP, the privacy policy covers the globe, and we will accelerate internationalisation in the future (by adding CDN and multiple languages). This is a business choice of 'validating locally before going overseas', not 'exclusionary'.GitHub is a technical community, and the decision should return to 'whether the technology is of high quality' and 'whether it is useful for the community'— placing 'political concerns' above technological value is what harms the community.If there are still worries about the 'Chinese label', the team can also commit to: relocating servers overseas and implementing more thorough data isolation (though this will increase costs), but the 'technological value' itself should not be buried by 'unfounded political labels'.

Chill out dude we're not pulling the "We hate china" card. we're just saying this PR wouldn't be the best for our programming community. There's no need for this issue tracker to get political... We're not labeling you and it's not about politics. it's about what's best for our users.

[YearnstudioYangyi]

既然那样，请您给出相关建议以便于我们优化我们的服务。

In that case, please provide relevant suggestions so that we can optimize our services.

[PPPDUD]

我理解大家对「和中国关联」的顾虑，但这里存在「技术工具」和「政治叙事」的认知错位：

编程社区的核心是代码/技术，不是舆论阵地——中国政府对纯技术平台的监管逻辑是「保障合规」，而非「无差别管控」；正规商业项目也不会拿用户数据冒险，法律和商业逻辑都不允许。

这个扩展「跨社区同步 + 自动隔离数据」的技术创新，能实实在在帮大家提效，这是 Merge 的核心价值。如果因为「标签偏见」拒掉，对社区是损失。

关于「中国优先」：团队从没限制外国 IP，隐私政策覆盖全球，未来也会加速国际化（加 CDN、多语言）。这是「先本土验证再出海」的商业选择，不是「排外」。 GitHub 是技术社区，决策该回到「技术是否优质」「是否对社区有用」——把「政治顾虑」凌驾于技术价值，才是对社区的伤害。

如果还是担心「中国标签」，团队也可以承诺：把服务器架到海外、做更彻底的数据隔离（当然这会增加成本），但「技术价值」本身不该被「莫须有的政治标签」埋没。

I understand everyone's concerns about 'being associated with China', but there is a cognitive dissonance between 'technical tools' and 'political narratives':The core of the programming community is code/technology, not a battleground for public opinion— the Chinese government's logic for regulating purely technical platforms is 'ensuring compliance', not 'indiscriminate control'; legitimate commercial projects will not risk user data, as both legal and business logic prohibit it.This technological innovation of 'cross-community synchronisation and automatic data isolation' can genuinely help improve efficiency for everyone, which is the core value of Merge. Rejecting it due to 'label bias' would be a loss for the community.Regarding 'China first': the team has never restricted foreign IP, the privacy policy covers the globe, and we will accelerate internationalisation in the future (by adding CDN and multiple languages). This is a business choice of 'validating locally before going overseas', not 'exclusionary'.GitHub is a technical community, and the decision should return to 'whether the technology is of high quality' and 'whether it is useful for the community'— placing 'political concerns' above technological value is what harms the community.If there are still worries about the 'Chinese label', the team can also commit to: relocating servers overseas and implementing more thorough data isolation (though this will increase costs), but the 'technological value' itself should not be buried by 'unfounded political labels'.

I'm not concerned about you or your project being Chinese. I love global innovation, and if your extension did not communicate non-Chinese IP addresses to servers from China, I would not have an issue.

Providing servers in another place would certainly be a start if you want to get a future extension merged. Extensions from you that do not talk to other websites are much more likely to get accepted.

[ampelectrecuted]

@GarboMuffin please lock this PR since it is getting too heated. I've also hidden my comments here

[PPPDUD]

@GarboMuffin please lock this PR since it is getting too heated. I've also hidden my comments here

The author is no longer arguing for their side, so the controversy should calm down soon.