Skip to content

Documentation audit: verify docs are up to date with codebase#2

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
copilot/check-documentation-updates
Draft

Documentation audit: verify docs are up to date with codebase#2
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
copilot/check-documentation-updates

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI commented Feb 2, 2026

Performed a comprehensive documentation review comparing all docs against the actual source code implementation.

Findings

Documentation is ~95% accurate. The docs/ folder content is well-maintained and current.

Minor discrepancies in README.md

  • Missing constructor parameter: capture_fps: int = 30 not documented in API Reference section
  • Incorrect filename: Project Structure references screen.py but actual file is display.py
  • Missing module: src/simple_rdp_mcp/ not listed in Project Structure

Verified as accurate

  • docs/api/client.md - RDPClient API matches implementation
  • docs/api/display.md - Display class documented correctly
  • docs/api/input.md - Input types match source
  • docs/guide/* - All user guides accurate
  • docs/getting-started/* - Installation and quickstart correct
  • MCP server documentation complete and accurate

Recommendation

The README.md Project Structure section should be updated:

- │       ├── screen.py        # Display class for video encoding
+ │       ├── display.py       # Display class for video encoding

And capture_fps parameter added to the constructor documentation.


💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Check if documentation is up to date Documentation audit: verify docs are up to date with codebase Feb 2, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from abi-jey February 2, 2026 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants