Conversation
|
This is actually really helpful. Thanks. |
|
The battle background randomization (new flag) keeps the same source images but swaps out palettes, palette shifts, translations and distortions. So the Desert Moles will still have the No. 3, Giygas will still be Giygas, but they will all be visually changed. As a side effect the gas station static and the naming screen background are also changed. Initial testing showed results ranging from decent to excellent. |
|
Question for you @abyssonym : Is there a way in your framework to have a flag, but have it not be part of the 'default' flags? I have randomization of NPC sprites (done matching collision size to ensure no bugs are caused) complete, but I suspect many people will not like the slightly-ugly aesthetic it gives when a phone is a lying-down dog and such. Definitely gives more of a vibe of the old Reshuffler. Alternatively it could be fine as is since people can always control the flags they want. I'm also going to work on implementing different PC sprites similar to the old Reshuffler, but those two are the last big changes I currently had on my to-do list. |
|
Generally for things like that I implement it as one of the "secret codes". It would be possible to create a reverse flag for it with a dummy object and checking against If you didn't know, any object that doesn't have a flag assigned will execute regardless, so in the method implementations you can manually check |
Sprite swap
randomizer.py
Outdated
| 0xfd, # Carrot key | ||
| ] | ||
| early_chests = sorted(cls.unassigned_chests, key=lambda c: c.cave_rank) | ||
| early_chests = early_chests[:len(early_chests)/3] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't mind if you want to weight these items toward the early parts of the cave, but I'd recommend against removing them from the latter parts altogether. In my view, finding a key that gives you a potential reason to backtrack to an earlier map to use it is a many times more interesting gameplay mechanic than reaching a locked door with the key already in your possession.
I'd recommend that they have the potential to appear anywhere in the dungeon, with diminishing likelihood the deeper into the dungeon you go.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see your point, but having watch a few playthroughs, the value of taking a skip decreases rapidly the deeper you get. After all, at halfway through, there’s a 50/50 shot the skip would take you backwards, and they do take a not-insigificant amount of time to investigate to find out where you are and if you’re going forwards or backwards—you basically have to go until you find a shiny spot or a previously found location.
At 75% in I think most people going for speed wouldn’t even take a skip if one showed up free right in front of them, let alone backtrack for one. I do see your point that they may be too frontloaded as is though. Will prolly adjust this next version, maybe to first 50 or 60 percent of locations? Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I figure there's value in simply being able to shortcut back to a previous area. If you're lucky and you've been paying attention, the shortcut might take you near an area with a shop or inn or phone, and that's useful even on the last few maps. Edge cases like that have value because they are rare; I wouldn't want to restrict the number of possible layouts of the dungeon and make it predictable to cater to speedrunners. Generally my design philosophy for randomizers is to make them such that anything is possible, but I agree that probabilities should be weighted heavily in favor of a balanced playthrough.
I'm planning to activate the custom randomness settings for this randomizer. If you like, we could link this feature to that, which would allow the user to roughly decide how unpredictable they want these items to be.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok, that sounds reasonable for the next version--I've seen that setting in your framework but just ignored it since I wasn't sure how it worked, so this could certainly be one of the things that ties into that. Speaking of, were you still thinking about adding me as a contributor to this repo so I'd be continuing the work here rather than in a fork? Either way's fine by me, just wondering.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, that's still on the agenda. Sorry it's taken so long, I've been busy with IRL stuff.
A small variety of improvements I've been making for my friend running this, figured I'd contribute them back.
Binary file not updated.