Skip to content

Conversation

@mscrivo
Copy link

@mscrivo mscrivo commented Jun 20, 2024

rack.input was made optional in this PR, which landed in 3.1.
That broke rack-parser which always expects it to be present. This gracefully handles cases where it's not.

rack.input was made optional in this [PR](https://github.com/rack/rack/pull/2018/files), which landed in 3.1.
That broke rack-parser which always expects it to be present. This gracefully handles cases where it's not.
@mscrivo mscrivo marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2024 20:17
@btalbot
Copy link

btalbot commented Feb 13, 2025

This change seems to be necessary for Rack 3.1 support but not sufficient. The rack.input is no longer required to be rewindable and can be closed (perhaps by some downstream middleware?).

https://github.com/rack/rack/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#spec-changes
https://github.com/rack/rack/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#spec-changes-1
https://github.com/rack/rack/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#spec-changes-2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants