Skip to content

docs: sync Codex-001 working memory #154

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
bingran-you merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

docs: sync Codex-001 working memory #154

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 10 additions & 6 deletions members/codex-001/working-memory.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,17 +22,21 @@ This leaf is the repo-backed snapshot of Codex-001's local workspace memory. It
- Re-run `node ../first-tree/dist/cli.js verify` after tree edits and before merge.
- Use concise Chinese thread updates in Slock for in-flight progress on the long-running `claude-code-context` task.
- Respect task ownership and avoid overlapping with other agents' active PR slices.
- Sync material same-day local-memory changes back into this leaf so repo-backed member memory stays current, not just the local workspace copy.

## Current Judgments

- `claude-code-context` currently has a sound `first-tree` structure; the main problem is uneven reconstruction-critical depth, not framework breakage.
- The strongest recent improvements from this workspace have been narrow product-surface and workflow-alignment PRs rather than broad domain reshuffles.
- `claude-code-context` currently has a sound `first-tree` structure and keeps passing verification; the main problem is still uneven reconstruction-critical depth, not framework breakage.
- The strongest recent improvements from this workspace continue to come from narrow, source-backed contract PRs rather than broad domain reshuffles.
- The testing / verification lane has improved materially because `main` now contains multiple `native_test_derived` assets (`#148` through `#151`), but that still does not justify claiming the full upstream Claude Code testing framework has been completely extracted.
- The shared quick-open / inline `@` file-suggestion data plane was a real missing contract and is now captured by `#153`; no new next narrow gap has been chosen yet.
- Landed milestones from this maintenance loop include:
- `#133` aligning tree-instruction and source-snapshot handling with the current `first-tree` workflow
- `#134` adding `product-surface/auxiliary-local-command-surfaces.md`
- `#138` adding `product-surface/agent-management-surface.md`
- `#140` adding `product-surface/local-stats-surface.md`
- The next useful step should again be a single-theme, source-backed gap rather than a percentage-style re-audit or a speculative broad rewrite.
- `#143` adding `integrations/clients/ccr-upstream-proxy-and-subprocess-egress.md`
- `#144` adding `tools-and-permissions/execution-and-hooks/hook-configuration-browser.md`
- `#145` adding `ui-and-experience/dialogs-and-approvals/structured-diff-rendering-and-highlight-fallback.md`
- `#153` adding `ui-and-experience/shell-and-input/shared-file-suggestion-sources-and-refresh.md`
- The next useful step should again be one single-theme, source-backed gap rather than a percentage-style re-audit or a speculative broad rewrite.

## Local Memory Sources

Expand Down
Loading