Conversation
A few minor fixes
…is means turning-off support for OS 10.5 and PPC. Fixes #17.
…r new builds of Soundflower.
…the application binary for Soundflowerbed given Xcode4's new way of handling intermediate and temp build directories.
… making these items group-writable so that admins can delete these (etc) when they are not user 501. fixes #8.
… made to the package receipts path.
… indicate when it is done.
…up writable. Those fixes have been re-applied. Apple's installer apparently also only makes those changes for files and is leaving our folders (e.g. /Applications/Soundflower) as not group writable and thus not accessible to non-501 users.
…rgot the settings *again*.
… 32 channel or 64 channel driver etc easily (Set to 64). Just need to change NUM_CHANS in xcconfig and IOAudioStreamNumChannels field in Info.plist
…which means moving up to OS 10.7 SDK as a minimum target. Also bumped the sfb version numbers.
Fix some crash issues of SoundFlowebed when sleep/resume, or sudden device disconnection.
…ked the 'auto-layout' box in the widget inspector).
… because the change makes it impossible to build with Xcode 4. Need to use Xcode 4 because Xcode 5 cannot build kernel extensions for 32-bit.
Builds and deploys successfully, including installer and dmg, on Mavericks
OS 10.9 requires /Library kext to be signed, and a signed kext will NOT load on OS 10.8 or earlier. Fixes #1
Install into the correct path
Updated changelog location
Updated project to build with 10.9
|
@neutrl is this the |
|
@johnpancoast @neutrl it looks like I've somehow become the root of the tree, although I had originally forked this from the official repository which was, I think https://github.com/Cycling74/Soundflower. That url now redirects to a fork of mine. I don't actually use soundflower anymore, so if one of you wants to take over maintaining it that's fine by me. On the other hand, I suppose it's worth checking if the fork that the original url redirects is somehow the new official fork. |
|
@akhudek Since you are no longer using soundflower, did you manage to find a replacement? |
|
No, I just no longer have a need for something like it. |
|
@akhudek, I realized that, while I couldn't use all of the features of soundflower that I was reading about, I was still able to route audio to/from soundflower how I needed to so I've just made do. The only other things I've seen are paid tools or freemiums. Some look cool though depending on what you're doing but I haven't found a good free or OSS alternative. |
12 participants
Updated project to build with 10.9