Fix type mismatch in smart contract function signatures#72
Open
algotables wants to merge 1 commit intoalgorand-coding-challenges:mainfrom
Open
Fix type mismatch in smart contract function signatures#72algotables wants to merge 1 commit intoalgorand-coding-challenges:mainfrom
algotables wants to merge 1 commit intoalgorand-coding-challenges:mainfrom
Conversation
This commit resolves the type mismatch issues in the VerifyMedicalAI smart contract by aligning the method signatures of `record_ai_info` with ARC4-specific types instead of basic Python types. The update ensures type safety and compatibility with ARC4's static type system, preventing build-time type errors. Changes: - Updated parameter types in the `record_ai_info` method from Python builtins to ARC4-specific types, ensuring that the method signatures correctly utilize `arc4.String`, `arc4.UInt64`, and `arc4.Bool` types as defined in the AiInfo struct.
Contributor
|
🎉 Congrats on solving the 4th Algorand Python Coding Challenge! I have labeled your PR approved, so you can now claim your certificate. You can claim your certificate of completion NFT here: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
1) What was the problem?
The problem was related to type mismatches in the
record_ai_infomethod signatures of theVerifyMedicalAIsmart contract. The method signatures were initially defined using basic Python types such asstr,bool, andUInt64. This led to compile-time errors because the ARC4 framework requires using ARC4-specific types (likearc4.String,arc4.Bool, andarc4.UInt64) for both defining data structures and for function parameters to maintain type safety and adhere to ARC4's strict type system. The errors were preventing the smart contract from being built, as ARC4 could not correctly interpret these basic Python types in the context of ARC4's static type checking.2) How did you solve the problem?
I solved the problem by updating the
record_ai_infomethod's parameter types from Python's built-in types to ARC4-specific types. This involved changing the function signatures to expectarc4.String,arc4.UInt64, andarc4.Booldirectly, rather than the standard Pythonstr,bool, andUInt64. By aligning the method signatures with the types used in theAiInfostruct, I ensured type consistency and compatibility across the contract. This change addressed the build errors by satisfying ARC4's type requirements, allowing the contract to compile successfully and ensuring that all operations within the contract adhere to the expected type safety standards of ARC4.3) Screenshot of your terminal showing the result of running the deploy script.