fix: add persistent cost to prevent under-reporting spent value #7763
+68
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…iving from the messages array max 100 messages are kept in the store/memory which leads to misreporting of the actual spend value
Contributor
|
Thanks for your contribution! This PR doesn't have a linked issue. All PRs must reference an existing issue. Please:
See CONTRIBUTING.md for details. |
Contributor
|
The following comment was made by an LLM, it may be inaccurate: No duplicate PRs found |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
This PR adds a persistent cost field to sessions to fix incorrect cost reporting in the sidebar when sessions exceed 100 messages. Previously, cost was calculated from the last 100 messages only, causing under-reporting for long sessions.
Key changes:
How did you verify your code works?
Verified with before/after testing on the same long session:
OpenCode v1.1.12
OpenCode local
Fixes #7767 #6989