-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 478
Removed table name and id from RFileScanner. #5512
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
dlmarion
merged 2 commits into
apache:2.1
from
dlmarion:5505-remove-table-rfile-scanner
Apr 28, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could have TABLE_ID = null and check that argument for
getConfigurationandgetTableNameis null/TABLE_ID to avoid accepting random values. Argument should beenv.getTableId()There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The RFileScanner is client utility where the user supplies the set of input files, configuration, columns they want to fetch, etc. I don't know that there is utility in validating the table id when this is being used outside of a table context.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this is a weird case where we need to pretend there is a table id when there isn't. I'm fine also not validating it, my idea was just that we should expect
env.getTableId()as the way of getting the table id when it is needed instead of accepting any table idThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does validating the table id and throwing an exception change the behavior of the code between the 2.1.3 and 2.1.4 releases? Are we going to introduce an error into the clients use of our utility by upgrading?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Answering my own question - Looking at the 2.1.3 RFileScanner code, IterEnv doesn't override
getServiceEnv,getPluginEnvorgetTableIdso any usage of those methods would throw an UnsupportedOperationException. We could add the validation, or not, it doesn't matter as the methods aren't called in RFileScanner.