pom.xml: upgrade trilead-ssh2 verison

[weizhouapache]

Description

This PR...

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[weizhouapache]

@soreana @kriegsmanj can you test this ?
this probably fixes #8055

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[soreana]

@soreana @kriegsmanj can you test this ? this probably fixes #8055

@weizhouapache I'm checking that. Thanks 🙏

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 7679

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #8198 (a232f85) into 4.18 (11b5831) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.18    #8198      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     13.10%   13.09%   -0.01%     
- Complexity     9121     9122       +1     
============================================
  Files          2720     2720              
  Lines        257599   257599              
  Branches      40158    40158              
============================================
- Hits          33747    33740       -7     
- Misses       219588   219596       +8     
+ Partials       4264     4263       -1     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 Codecov offers a browser extension for seamless coverage viewing on GitHub. Try it in Chrome or Firefox today!

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan test matrix

[yadvr]

LGTM but we need to check/test that this doesn’t bring any regressions

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan test matrix

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver71, rocky8 mgmt + vmware67u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-8283)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 50905 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr8198-t8283-kvm-centos7.zip
Smoke tests completed. 108 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_01_invalid_upgrade_kubernetes_cluster	Failure	3622.99	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_02_upgrade_kubernetes_cluster	Failure	3610.74	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_03_deploy_and_scale_kubernetes_cluster	Failure	0.04	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_04_autoscale_kubernetes_cluster	Failure	0.04	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_05_basic_lifecycle_kubernetes_cluster	Failure	0.04	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_06_delete_kubernetes_cluster	Failure	0.04	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_07_deploy_kubernetes_ha_cluster	Failure	0.04	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_08_upgrade_kubernetes_ha_cluster	Failure	0.04	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_09_delete_kubernetes_ha_cluster	Failure	0.05	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_10_vpc_tier_kubernetes_cluster	Failure	46.09	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
ContextSuite context=TestKubernetesCluster>:teardown	Error	101.52	test_kubernetes_clusters.py

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-8282)
Environment: vmware-67u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server r8
Total time taken: 52612 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr8198-t8282-vmware-67u3.zip
Smoke tests completed. 106 look OK, 3 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_03_ping_in_ssvm_success	Error	1.12	test_diagnostics.py
test_04_ping_in_ssvm_failure	Error	1.12	test_diagnostics.py
test_08_arping_in_ssvm	Error	1.12	test_diagnostics.py
test_09_arping_in_cpvm	Error	1.12	test_diagnostics.py
test_11_traceroute_in_ssvm	Error	1.12	test_diagnostics.py
test_15_retrieve_ssvm_default_files	Error	2.66	test_diagnostics.py
test_16_retrieve_ssvm_single_file	Error	1.13	test_diagnostics.py
test_01_add_primary_storage_disabled_host	Error	35.65	test_primary_storage.py
test_01_non_strict_host_anti_affinity	Failure	144.32	test_nonstrict_affinity_group.py
test_02_non_strict_host_affinity	Error	103.02	test_nonstrict_affinity_group.py

[DaanHoogland]

CLGTM, but needs extensive testing (component test suites?)

[soreana]

@weizhouapache I tested the PR, it didn't fix #8055 . Without these changes, it took roughly 10 minutes to restart a VPC with cleanup in an empty test environment. After applying the changes, the same VPC still required around 10 minutes for the restart.

Also tested VM deployments and ACL assignments they worked fine.

[weizhouapache]

@weizhouapache I tested the PR, it didn't fix #8055 . Without these changes, it took roughly 10 minutes to restart a VPC with cleanup in an empty test environment. After applying the changes, the same VPC still required around 10 minutes for the restart.

Also tested VM deployments and ACL assignments they worked fine.

thanks @soreana
that's not good to know ;-D let's discuss in the issue #8055

[DaanHoogland]

Do we think this should be merged anyway?

[weizhouapache]

closing as it did not help #8055