server: fix fail to list public ips of shared networks sometimes#8624
Conversation
error
```
2024-02-07 10:59:11,110 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (qtp1146825051-20:ctx-74413901 ctx-b91ecc51) (logid:aa41ab63) unhandled exception executing api command: [Ljava.lang.String;@5a46b058
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.cloud.vm.NicVO.getInstanceId(NicVO.java:256)
at com.cloud.api.ApiResponseHelper.addSystemVmInfoToIpResponse(ApiResponseHelper.java:995)
at com.cloud.api.ApiResponseHelper.showVmInfoForSharedNetworks(ApiResponseHelper.java:1175)
at com.cloud.api.ApiResponseHelper.createIPAddressResponse(ApiResponseHelper.java:1088)
at org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.address.ListPublicIpAddressesCmd.execute(ListPublicIpAddressesCmd.java:196)
```
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.19 #8624 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 30.75% 30.95% +0.20%
- Complexity 33964 34220 +256
============================================
Files 5346 5346
Lines 375435 375447 +12
Branches 54603 54606 +3
============================================
+ Hits 115460 116218 +758
+ Misses 244742 243914 -828
- Partials 15233 15315 +82
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 8612 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 8613 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 8631 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 8633 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-9185)
|
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-9429)
|
31c9bc3 to
4f6ed22
Compare
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9668 |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10239)
|
|
@DaanHoogland @weizhouapache is this good to merge? |
|
let's make sure it doesn't cause the integration test failures |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 9719 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9721 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10308)
|
Description
This PR fixes #8622
error
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?