protect against missing service offering#9235
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.19 #9235 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 4.29% 14.96% +10.66%
- Complexity 0 11013 +11013
============================================
Files 363 5378 +5015
Lines 29347 469813 +440466
Branches 5126 59391 +54265
============================================
+ Hits 1261 70290 +69029
- Misses 27943 391737 +363794
- Partials 143 7786 +7643
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@vladimirpetrov a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 9921 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@vladimirpetrov a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9928 |
BryanMLima
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just one comment, overall, LGTM.
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9944 |
vladimirpetrov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM based on manual testing, couldn't get a NPE even after nasty db manipulations.
* protect agains missing service offering * search removed before assuming none * import * javadoc
Description
This PR...
Fixes: #9160
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?