-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 702
Matrix custom env vars #3376
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Matrix custom env vars #3376
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
27 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
587a09d
first pass
rnro 12f15fd
log docker command
rnro 18cdfc0
don't expose setup command as env var
rnro 10501ca
test env vars
rnro 11959c3
wire up env var parameters
rnro df8e205
change windows env var substitution syntax
rnro e50bc6b
merge in 6.2 changes
rnro b348db6
test shim
rnro 0c7b341
Revert "test env vars"
rnro 3ab2ae1
adopt in release builds and C++
rnro 9c8a04b
split out parse_env_vars, use on macos, static SDK
rnro 40fedda
test env vars
rnro a1ddcef
more test shim
rnro a1edbf9
test
rnro 0870038
more tests
rnro acb9bf2
testing
rnro ef725b3
more testing env vars
rnro a326bad
export on macos
rnro 7a9a174
tweaks
rnro bfe8591
fix
rnro eb1d46c
unpick testing shims and variables
rnro caabec7
update license
rnro 7902b6e
remove testing params
rnro 6050593
matrix env vars as JSON
rnro 2c3c5ff
testing
rnro 2aec72d
static sdk env
rnro 98ed956
Revert "testing"
rnro File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At this point, isn't the schema defining
env
as typeobject
? If so, is the first boolean statement in this expression necessary?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Relatedly, I think we're really starting to grow beyond the current method. I understand that "inputs" only have restricted types (string, choice, boolean). Clearly it'd be out of scope for this PR, but would moving these to be Actions-proper support having richer inputs? e.g.