Skip to content

Per-request permission management #386

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
lanseg wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Per-request permission management #386

lanseg wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

@lanseg
Copy link

@lanseg lanseg commented Dec 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Issue #379

Screenshot 2025-11-27 at 15-24-34 Extract – Détails de la demande 12 - Test request 2 _ MO - Cadastre complet

Purpose: per-request user ownership, make it possible for one operator to make a single request visible to another operator, even if the second operator is not an owner of the parent process.

Behavior:

  1. Admin user sees all requests, no matter what users or groups are configured for the request or process
  2. User can see or modify request if any of this applies:
    1. User or user's group is added to a Request
    2. User or user's group is added to a parent Process of this request
  3. A request-owning User can modify request-owning users and groups.
  4. After the user removes themselves from the request owners list, per-process ownership rules apply.

lanseg added 3 commits December 1, 2025 12:59
@lanseg
feat(GSGGR-581): per-request permission management (#11)
9dd8241 
* Working version: visibility for groups and users

* Added filtering for completed requests

* Added translations for the card title

* Fixed session errors in test

* Added basic test for the per-request ownership

* Move ownership-related parts into an external class

* Added db migrations, similar to existing ones
@lanseg
Add missing translation for request details (#12)
be1b92e
@lanseg
Added missing test file
3c20514
@benoitregamey
Copy link
Contributor

benoitregamey commented Dec 4, 2025

Thank you for the contribution, will look it next week.

@lanseg
Copy link
Author

lanseg commented Jan 7, 2026

Hi! Any progress on the pull request review?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@lanseg @benoitregamey