generated from bazel-contrib/rules-template
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
fix: Add parent dirs to mtree #96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
rparme
wants to merge
2
commits into
aspect-build:main
Choose a base branch
from
rparme:fix/add-parent-folders-to-mtree
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at this comment and your the code you are adding, is this something we could simplify by using some rules from https://github.com/bazel-contrib/tar.bzl/blob/main/docs/mtree.md?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What part are you looking to simplify exactly?
The
mtree_specrule simply creates an mtree file for the files passed insrcs, it won't create entries for parent dirs of these files.mtree_mutatehas many properties but none that would help either except having a whole differentawk_script.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't look too much into the details. I just saw this comment and would have guessed that this could be implemented already somewhere else. Nevermind.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree we should try to de-duplicate these if we can.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I didn't realize this is related to the comment.
What about making
_mtree_linepublic in @tar.bzl//tar:mtree.bzl, similarly to what is done fors3_syncin rules_aws ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah that's the obvious answer. However I suspect there's a somewhat more substantial code sharing possible here, since https://github.com/aspect-build/rules_py/blob/main/py/private/py_image_layer.bzl was created after this rule is sketched out. @thesayyn can confirm - or if you have a few minutes to compare the implementations, maybe it's obvious how to do it.