-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
Update README.md #87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update README.md #87
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ There comes a time when there is enough disagreement among community members | |
| and stakers about key concerns regarding the business of their chain, such as | ||
| its vision, mission, tokenomics, architecture, implementation, or philosophy; | ||
| that it makes the most sense to support an alternative fork running alongside | ||
| the original so as to be prepared against all contingencies. | ||
| the original to be prepared against all contingencies. | ||
|
|
||
| Recent times have seen the Cosmos community grappling with significant | ||
| challenges stemming from differences about core tokenomics, about the very | ||
|
|
@@ -43,22 +43,22 @@ hub credibility. | |
|
|
||
| These and prior disagreements have now made clear the need for an alternative | ||
| hub with a renewed focus and Alignment to serve as the canonical minimal | ||
| IBC/ICS token hub with respect to Cosmos to champion the ideals of sovereignty, | ||
| IBC/ICS token hub for Cosmos to champion the ideals of sovereignty, | ||
| security, and decentralization everywhere; and secondarily to serve as the main | ||
| base for a political party and more-intelligent voting bloc with respect to | ||
| Gaia to save Gaia from itself. A modification to the distribution of $ATONE | ||
| through slashing those who voted in favor of #848 would help ensure that the | ||
| Gaia to save Gaia from itself. A modification to the distribution of $ATONE, | ||
| a through slashing of those who voted in favor of #848 would help ensure that the | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. did you mean "through a slashing of"? or "such as through a slashing of"?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, I meant "through a slashing of". |
||
| resultant distribution is more intelligent about security and would make us | ||
| anti-fragile against even the most powerful of adversaries. | ||
|
|
||
| ---------------------------------------- | ||
| # Vision and Missions | ||
|
|
||
| The vision behind this AtomOne fork is to be an alternative minimal fork of | ||
| Gaia ("cosmoshub4") running alongside Gaia to prepare for all contingencies, | ||
| Gaia ("cosmoshub4") running alongside Gaia to prepare for all contingencies | ||
WaqarMMirza marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| and also to operate as a political party base in relation to Gaia. We strive to | ||
| complement the broader Cosmos ecosystem while introducing innovative solutions | ||
| and perspectives. Our goals are not just to resolve current challenges but are | ||
| and perspectives. Our goals are not just to resolve current challenges but | ||
| also to set a new precedent for adaptive and responsive self-organization in | ||
| the multichain multitoken universe that we call the Cosmos. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ AtomOne re-commits to the original vision and primary mission of Gaia to serve | |
| as a minimal IBC/ICS hub secured by a staking token that targets 2/3 of the | ||
| stake to be bonded. We believe that minimizing the risk profile is necessary as | ||
| an existential issue for the hub, and an issue of financial security of the | ||
| highest order for not just the hub but its hosted shards and IBC connected | ||
| network allowing AtomOne to occupy a real and an important niche. When there | ||
| the highest order for not just the hub but its hosted shards and IBC connected | ||
| network allowing AtomOne to occupy a real and important niche. When there | ||
| is a double-spend attack on the hub, the staking tokens of those responsible | ||
| for the attack should be used to compensate the victims as much as reasonable, | ||
| and the non-zero remainder of the penalty burned. A staking token of an | ||
|
|
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ comparison. | |
| IBC/ICS hubs should in general remain conservative in its function and offer | ||
| utility through dependability and scaling. Any experiments that change the | ||
| nature of the hub belong in new forks or splits, and an ideal hub enables them | ||
| despite of and in order to celebrate these differences. In the Cosmos there is | ||
| despite and in order to celebrate these differences. In the Cosmos, there is | ||
| no need for contention as with land-locked states because there is no | ||
| limitation of finite land. We can create new forks/splits/groups that are | ||
| better aligned with what we need if there is enough need or support for it. | ||
|
|
@@ -112,11 +112,11 @@ the AtomOne hub. | |
| ## Significance as a Political Base | ||
|
|
||
| There are many of stakers and users of Gaia that are aligned with the | ||
| values, principles, original mission of Gaia and those of AtomOne, but we have | ||
| values, principles, and original mission of Gaia and those of AtomOne, but we have | ||
| no explicit base of operations. In contrast, the informal opposition majority | ||
| party (which came about first) is well organized in comparison, usually behind | ||
| closed doors. Meanwhile "liquid staking" providers are providing a service that | ||
| does more than liquid staking, but have their own governance and powers and | ||
| does more than liquid staking, but has their own governance and powers and | ||
| thus act as a kind of political base. For example, which validators to stake to | ||
| is determined through governance in Informal/Stride. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.