Skip to content

Conversation

@ujohnny
Copy link
Collaborator

@ujohnny ujohnny commented Dec 10, 2025

For some reason in Java/Kotlin interop a nullable type was visible as non-nullable in kotlin, so this led to unexpected NPE in code. Fixed with proper annotations on the Java side and adjusted the documentation.

For some reason in Java/Kotlin interop a nullable type was visible
as non-nullable in kotlin, so this led to unexpected NPE in code.
Fixed with proper annotations on the Java side and adjusted
the documentation.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @ujohnny, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a NullPointerException occurring in Java/Kotlin interop within the "RadTestContextProviderKt.chooseTargetForFile" function. The fix involves explicitly marking nullable return types in Java code using JetBrains annotations, which allows Kotlin to correctly infer and handle potential null values. This ensures robust null safety and prevents runtime errors when integrating Java and Kotlin components.

Highlights

  • Java Nullability Annotations: Added "@NotNull" and "@nullable" annotations to "ListenableFuture" return types in "SourceToTargetFinder.java" and "FuturesUtil.java" to accurately reflect potential null results, improving Java/Kotlin interop.
  • Kotlin Null Safety Handling: Updated Kotlin code in "RadTestContextProvider.kt" to correctly handle nullable "ListenableFuture" results from Java by using "orEmpty()" to provide a default empty collection, preventing NPEs.
  • Coroutine Refactoring: Replaced "async { ... }.asListenableFuture()" with the more concise "future { ... }" construct in "RadTestContextProvider.kt" for creating "ListenableFuture"s from coroutines.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively resolves a NullPointerException caused by a Java/Kotlin interoperability issue where a nullable type was treated as non-nullable. The fix, which involves adding proper nullability annotations in the Java code and handling the potential null value in the Kotlin code, is correct and well-implemented. The changes also improve the code by using the more direct future coroutine builder. I have one suggestion to improve the consistency of a function's return value.

@ujohnny
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ujohnny commented Dec 10, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively addresses a NullPointerException (NPE) issue arising from Kotlin/Java interop by introducing @NotNull annotations and providing non-null fallback values (empty lists) in FuturesUtil and related SourceToTarget helper classes. This ensures that methods returning collections consistently provide non-null results, aligning with Kotlin's null-safety principles. The changes also include minor refactoring, such as leveraging var for type inference and utilizing the kotlinx.coroutines.guava.future builder for more concise asynchronous code.

@ujohnny ujohnny force-pushed the enovozhilov/fix-npe branch 2 times, most recently from 1b36c21 to d48d163 Compare December 10, 2025 16:39
Do not allow nullable collections, since they are anti-pattern
@ujohnny ujohnny force-pushed the enovozhilov/fix-npe branch from d48d163 to 29ed77e Compare December 10, 2025 16:41
@ujohnny
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ujohnny commented Dec 10, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively resolves a NullPointerException in RadTestContextProvider.kt that stemmed from a Java/Kotlin interoperability issue with nullability. The fix is robust, involving the addition of @NotNull annotations to Java APIs to guarantee non-null return values, which prevents unexpected nulls in the Kotlin code. The changes are propagated consistently up the call stack, from FuturesUtil to SourceToTargetFinder and SourceToTargetHelper, and the calling Kotlin code is simplified accordingly. Overall, this is a high-quality change that improves code safety and clarity. I have one suggestion to further improve the robustness of the future handling logic.

Comment on lines -49 to +51
val target = pluginProjectScope(context.project).async {
chooseTargetForFile(context, findTargets(context).await())
}.asListenableFuture()
val target = pluginProjectScope(context.project).future {
val targets = findTargets(context).await()
chooseTargetForFile(context, targets)
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there still a reason for this change after introducing the non-nullable API?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting-review Awaiting review from Bazel team on PRs product: CLion CLion plugin product: GoLand GoLand plugin product: IntelliJ IntelliJ plugin

Projects

Status: Untriaged

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants