Skip to content

Conversation

@xry111
Copy link

@xry111 xry111 commented Oct 7, 2023

No description provided.

@zackw zackw marked this pull request as draft March 26, 2024 18:56
@zackw
Copy link
Collaborator

zackw commented Mar 26, 2024

With the text as is, it would not be correct to merge this patch until after #109 is merged. The necessary compiler support now exists, but libxcrypt must also be changed to use that support before we can say "LTO is supported".

@xry111 If you would like to revise your change so that it accurately summarizes the present state of affairs (see #24 as well as #109), then I'll consider merging it.

@xry111
Copy link
Author

xry111 commented Mar 26, 2024

With the text as is, it would not be correct to merge this patch until after #109 is merged. The necessary compiler support now exists, but libxcrypt must also be changed to use that support before we can say "LTO is supported".

@xry111 If you would like to revise your change so that it accurately summarizes the present state of affairs (see #24 as well as #109), then I'll consider merging it.

We are already using that support since 38f7f06, AFAIK. But #109 already contains the wanted README.md change so I'll close this.

@xry111 xry111 closed this Mar 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants