-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 254
Add missing tests of BitCascadingValueProvider (#11850) #11851
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing tests of BitCascadingValueProvider (#11850) #11851
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughAdds comprehensive unit tests for the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/BitCascadingValueProviderTests.cs (1)
167-193: Consider adding assertion forconsumer.Greetingin the null values test.The test validates
NullableNumberis null but doesn't explicitly assert thatGreetingis also null on the consumer. While the markup assertion"-"implies both are null, an explicit assertion would improve test clarity.Assert.IsNull(intCascade.Value); Assert.AreEqual("Greeting", stringCascade.Name); Assert.IsNull(consumer.NullableNumber); + Assert.IsNull(consumer.Greeting); component.MarkupMatches("-");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/BitCascadingValueProviderTests.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/CascadingConsumer.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/NullableConsumer.cs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/CascadingConsumer.cs (1)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/NullableConsumer.cs (1)
BuildRenderTree(12-15)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/NullableConsumer.cs (1)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/CascadingConsumer.cs (1)
BuildRenderTree(12-15)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/BitCascadingValueProviderTests.cs (3)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Utils/Params/BitCascadingValueProvider.cs (1)
BitCascadingValueProvider(9-93)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/CascadingConsumer.cs (1)
CascadingConsumer(6-16)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/NullableConsumer.cs (1)
NullableConsumer(6-16)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: build Bit.BlazorUI
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/NullableConsumer.cs (1)
6-16: LGTM!The
NullableConsumertest helper is well-structured. It correctly uses nullable types (int?,string?) for cascading parameters, enabling tests to validate null value handling inBitCascadingValueProvider. The implementation mirrors the pattern used inCascadingConsumer.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/CascadingConsumer.cs (1)
6-16: LGTM!Clean implementation of a test helper component. The use of non-nullable
intforNumber(defaulting to 0 if not cascaded) and nullablestring?forGreetingprovides good coverage for different cascading parameter scenarios.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/BitCascadingValueProviderTests.cs (1)
9-36: Good test coverage for cascading value provisioning.The test class comprehensively covers the
BitCascadingValueProvidercomponent with well-structured tests for enumerable values, null entries, empty states, and parameter precedence.
closes #11850
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.