-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 254
Add missing tests of BitParams (#11852) #11853
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing tests of BitParams (#11852) #11853
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughAdds comprehensive unit tests for the BitParams component, including four new test files: a test class with eight MSTest unit tests, two parameter test helper classes (FakeParamsA and FakeParamsB), and a test utility Blazor component (ParamsConsumer) that consumes cascading parameters. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/BitParamsTests.cs (2)
35-69: Good coverage of provider values; be aware of internal couplingThe two tests
ShouldProvideValuesWithNamesAndFixedFlagShouldSkipNullParametersthoroughly verify that
BitParams:
- passes the original param instances into
BitCascadingValueProvider,- preserves the
Name,- marks them as fixed, and
- filters out
nullentries.The only trade‑off is that they directly depend on the
BitCascadingValueProvidertype and itsValuesshape, so refactoring the internal plumbing (while preserving observable behavior) could break these tests. That’s reasonable if you want to lock in the current implementation, but if you anticipate internal changes, consider adding a more black‑box test variant that asserts behavior only via rendered output.
103-137: Unknown-parameter handling and rerender behavior look correct; minor async refinement possibleThe last two tests:
ShouldIgnoreUnknownParametersAndNotThrowcorrectly verifies thatSetParametersAsyncignores an"Unknown"parameter while still wiring upParameters.ShouldUpdateParametersOnRerendervalidates that changing the parameters fromFakeParamsAtoFakeParamsBresults in the expected"-Hello"output fromParamsConsumer, confirming that cascading values update across renders.The synchronous
GetAwaiter().GetResult()onInvokeAsyncis acceptable in this MSTest/bUnit context, but if you ever move to async test methods you could simplify that test toawait component.Instance.SetParametersAsync(parameters)instead.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/BitParamsTests.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/FakeParamsA.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/FakeParamsB.cs(1 hunks)src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/ParamsConsumer.cs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: build Bit.BlazorUI
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/FakeParamsA.cs (1)
3-7: Simple, stable test stub looks good
FakeParamsAis a minimal, immutable implementation tailored for the BitParams tests and reads clearly (fixedNameandValue). No changes needed here.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/ParamsConsumer.cs (1)
6-15: Cascading parameter consumer is correct and aligns with tests
ParamsConsumercorrectly binds to the named cascading parameters"A"and"B"and renders the expected"value-text"pattern (including the"-Hello"case whenAis absent). The use of null-conditional accessors and a single sequence inBuildRenderTreeis appropriate here.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/FakeParamsB.cs (1)
3-7: Symmetric, deterministic test parameter implementation
FakeParamsBmirrorsFakeParamsAin structure and provides fixed, human-readable values for the tests. It’s a good, simple fixture class for exercising BitParams behavior.src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Tests/Utils/Params/BitParamsTests.cs (2)
12-32: End‑to‑end cascading test is clear and robust
ShouldCascadeParametersToChildrennicely validates the full pipeline:BitParams→ cascading values →ParamsConsumeroutput"1-Hello". The use of real component composition instead of inspecting internals gives a solid behavioral test.
71-101: Rendering behavior with null/empty parameters is well coveredThe trio of tests
ShouldRenderChildContentWhenParametersNullShouldRenderChildContentWhenParametersEmptyShouldRenderEmptyWhenNoChildAndNoParametersprovide good coverage of the main edge cases for
BitParamsrendering. They make the intended contract very explicit and should catch regressions in how the component handles missing or empty parameter collections.
closes #11852
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.