Skip to content

test: add UVerify contract blueprint for integration testing#574

Open
matiwinnetou wants to merge 1 commit intofeat/blueprint-batch-9from
feat/blueprint-batch-10
Open

test: add UVerify contract blueprint for integration testing#574
matiwinnetou wants to merge 1 commit intofeat/blueprint-batch-9from
feat/blueprint-batch-10

Conversation

@matiwinnetou
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@matiwinnetou matiwinnetou changed the base branch from master to feat/blueprint-batch-9 February 13, 2026 11:13
@matiwinnetou matiwinnetou changed the title Feat/blueprint batch 10 tests: add UVerify contract blueprint for integration testing Feb 13, 2026
@matiwinnetou matiwinnetou force-pushed the feat/blueprint-batch-10 branch from a6e0254 to 3ae7a86 Compare February 13, 2026 11:14
@matiwinnetou matiwinnetou changed the title tests: add UVerify contract blueprint for integration testing test: add UVerify contract blueprint for integration testing Feb 13, 2026
@matiwinnetou matiwinnetou force-pushed the feat/blueprint-batch-10 branch from 3ae7a86 to b16b96a Compare February 13, 2026 11:14
Added UVerify Plutus v3 contract blueprint generated with Aiken v1.1.21+42babe5.
This contract provides validators for connected goods and social hub functionality
in the UVerify decentralized verification system.

**Blueprint Structure:**
- Extensions/connected_goods validators (mint, spend, else)
- Extensions/social_hub validators (mint, spend, else)
- Library spend validator

**Files Added:**
- annotation-processor/src/it/resources/blueprint/uverify_aiken_v1_1_21_42babe5.json
- annotation-processor/src/it/java/.../it/UVerify.java (blueprint interface)

**Next Steps:**
- Annotation processor will generate validator classes from blueprint
- Functional tests can be added in quicktx module to test validators
@matiwinnetou matiwinnetou force-pushed the feat/blueprint-batch-10 branch from b16b96a to 5277dfe Compare February 13, 2026 11:18
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@matiwinnetou matiwinnetou marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2026 11:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant