Skip to content

Archive old prototypes and implement Neobrutalist Valentine Protocol#1

Open
bmendonca3 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
neobrutalist-valentine-8704437296735170557
Open

Archive old prototypes and implement Neobrutalist Valentine Protocol#1
bmendonca3 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
neobrutalist-valentine-8704437296735170557

Conversation

@bmendonca3
Copy link
Owner

@bmendonca3 bmendonca3 commented Feb 2, 2026

Archived existing prototypes into 'archive/' directory. Implemented a new single-page application "The Valentine Protocol" featuring Neobrutalist design, evasive 'No' button logic, live countdown, and GSAP animations.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 8704437296735170557 started by @bmendonca3


Note

Low Risk
Low risk: adds a standalone static page (HTML/CSS/JS) with client-side animations and no backend/data handling beyond browser interactions.

Overview
Introduces a new single-page experience, ISSUE NO. 001: THE VALENTINE PROTOCOL, styled with Tailwind + custom neobrutalist CSS and external animation libraries (GSAP + canvas-confetti).

Adds client-side interactions in script.js: a randomized countdown timer, terminal-style log feed, an evasive/shrinking “No” button that teleports on hover/nearby cursor, and a “Yes” flow that triggers confetti and transitions to a confirmation/voucher overlay.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit bf3833c. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@google-labs-jules
Copy link

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Copy link

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with Cloud Agents, enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

This PR is being reviewed by Cursor Bugbot

Details

You are on the Bugbot Free tier. On this plan, Bugbot will review limited PRs each billing cycle.

To receive Bugbot reviews on all of your PRs, visit the Cursor dashboard to activate Pro and start your 14-day free trial.

ease: "power1.out"
});
});
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parallax loop redundantly animates same element multiple times

Medium Severity

The parallax mousemove handler iterates over floatingElements but applies the animation to productBox on each iteration instead. This causes gsap.to(productBox, ...) to be called 4 times per mouse move with identical values. Additionally, the calculated variables mouseX, mouseY, speed, x, and y are never used. The loop appears to be leftover from a refactor (per the comment about avoiding CSS keyframe conflicts) and the animation call needs to be moved outside the loop.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

</div>
<div class="flex justify-between border-b border-gray-300 pb-2">
<span class="font-bold">DATE:</span>
<span>FEB 14, 2024</span>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Voucher displays hardcoded date from 2 years ago

Low Severity

The voucher confirmation screen displays a hardcoded date of "FEB 14, 2024" which is 2 years in the past. Unlike the obvious [HER NAME] placeholders, this date appears legitimate but is incorrect for the intended use as a Valentine's Day dinner invitation. The recipient would see a past date, making the invitation confusing or appearing like an old/expired voucher.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant