Skip to content

Conversation

@kshakir
Copy link
Contributor

@kshakir kshakir commented Sep 18, 2022

No description provided.

@kshakir
Copy link
Contributor Author

kshakir commented Sep 18, 2022

This memory-related PR enhances #6766. The former addresses portable command <<< … >>> blocks (across Cromwell backends) and this PR enables portable more-memory functionality.

The prior "Side note" still applies. Instead of changing the existing Papi tests to run on all backends this PR adds (mostly copy/pasted) TES tests. This is because:

  1. As noted the memory runtime attribute isn't currently supported by the Local backend, and
  2. Other backends like AWSBATCH are mostly disabled in CI.

@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_retry branch from cf0b421 to 5b53820 Compare May 9, 2023 15:35
@kshakir kshakir requested a review from a team as a code owner May 9, 2023 15:35
@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_retry branch from 5b53820 to 0da566c Compare May 9, 2023 19:05
@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_env branch from b9fc1c3 to 61063cb Compare May 11, 2024 01:05
@kshakir kshakir changed the title Optional retry with more memory for all standard backends. CROM-6919 Optional retry with more memory for all standard backends. May 11, 2024
@kshakir kshakir marked this pull request as draft May 11, 2024 01:11
@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_retry branch 2 times, most recently from 4862544 to 0477642 Compare May 11, 2024 03:01
@kshakir kshakir marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2024 06:16
@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_env branch from 61063cb to 5c2e28b Compare June 24, 2025 18:00
@kshakir kshakir requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2025 18:00
@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_retry branch from 0477642 to f5b9632 Compare June 24, 2025 18:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant