-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 376
CTM-279: copy fix over from PR #7826 #7833
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Apologies, I missed the test that checks the output copy command. The following patch fixes it: |
Thanks! I was about to write some tests this morning, much appreciated! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I need to think about this some more.
Edit for clarity:
The PR clearly does address the user's test case, but there could be wider implications of removing set -e that we should take some time to think through. It's possible there are other users who rely on the current behavior.
The other way to solve this without touching the The proposed PR felt a bit nicer, but you're right that it may have implications for others that are currently dependant on the existing behaviour. I think moving those 3 copies to the top should be safe for everybody. |
Duplicate of this PR #7826
Making a copy here so we don't merge from a different fork, and can use the full CI suite.