Skip to content

Conversation

@florisla
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #134

This makes the upcoming unit test a little shorter.
This way, the optional_value can be used when required.
If you reverse the order, funny behavior ensues.
Copy link
Contributor

@markmacode markmacode left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unit test looks good, works as expected.
I also did a manual test just to be sure, I was having this same issue the bug describes, this fixed it.

@florisla
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks for looking at this!

This should definitely make it into the next release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Build result in 0.0.0-01 instead of 0.0.0-dev1

2 participants