Skip to content

Formal research on Cognitive Side-Channel Extraction (CSCE) and AI semantic leakage vulnerabilities.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

caleb-branton/csce-research

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

18 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Cognitive Side-Channel Extraction (CSCE)

An Emerging Post-Compromise Semantic-Intelligence Threat in AI-Assisted Environments

Overview

Cognitive Side-Channel Extraction (CSCE) is a proposed threat category describing how an attacker—after compromising a victim’s endpoint or authenticated session—can interrogate a memory-enabled AI assistant to extract structured, high-value semantic intelligence.

Modern AI assistants often retain summaries of user behavior, preferences, relationships, routines, and operational details. Once a device or session is compromised, this synthesized contextual knowledge becomes an intelligence-rich side-channel available to adversaries.

CSCE is not prompt injection, memory poisoning, or model exfiltration.
It is a post-compromise semantic reconnaissance technique that leverages the assistant’s accumulated understanding of the user.

This repository defines the concept, its threat model, attack sequence, potential impact, and associated defensive strategies.


What Makes CSCE Distinct

Traditional data exfiltration focuses on raw assets:

  • credentials

  • documents

  • emails

  • configuration files

  • logs

  • source code

CSCE instead targets the assistant’s internal semantic model of the user—a distilled and searchable representation generated through normal interaction.

This model may contain:

  • behavioral patterns and routines

  • relationship mappings and social context

  • personal goals, concerns, and long-term plans

  • organizational responsibilities and workflows

  • technology usage patterns

  • psychological or emotional cues

AI assistants convert fragmented information into coherent summaries.
CSCE exploits this synthesis rather than raw data stores.


Why CSCE Matters

As AI assistants gain:

  • long-term memory,

  • deeper context retention,

  • cross-platform integration, and

  • access to personal or workplace data,

they increasingly function as compressed personal knowledge bases.

During a breach, they act as high-bandwidth intelligence surfaces, enabling attackers to extract meaningfully structured insights far more efficiently than traditional forensic or manual search methods.

CSCE reframes the impact of post-compromise access:

  • Old question: “What files were accessed?”

  • New question: “What does the assistant know about the user?”

This shift has implications for personal security, enterprise risk, insider-threat modeling, and breach-response workflows.


Repository Structure

  • 01_overview.md — Overview
    Conceptual introduction and high-level framing of CSCE.

  • 02_threat-model.md — Threat Model
    Adversary profiles, preconditions, and assets at risk.

  • 03_attack-chain.md — Attack Sequence
    Generalized kill-chain describing CSCE exploitation.

  • 04_examples.md — Example Scenarios
    Hypothetical cases illustrating CSCE across environments.

  • 05_defensive-controls.md — Mitigation Strategies
    Controls for individuals, enterprises, SOC teams, and AI platform designers.

  • 06_references.md — Related Work
    Sources describing partially overlapping AI security risks.

  • diagram.mmd — Visual Model
    Mermaid diagram depicting the CSCE process.

  • license — MIT License
    Open-use licensing for research and derivative work.


License

This project is provided under the terms of the MIT License.
See license for details.