Skip to content

Conversation

@mr-cal
Copy link
Contributor

@mr-cal mr-cal commented Jul 17, 2025

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you signed the CLA?
  • Have you successfully run make lint && make test?

A longer term fix is to use full policy checker from starflow, but this is a quick fix that should unblock #777.

Signed-off-by: Callahan Kovacs <callahan.kovacs@canonical.com>
@mr-cal mr-cal marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2025 16:26
@mr-cal mr-cal requested a review from cmatsuoka as a code owner July 17, 2025 16:26
@mr-cal mr-cal requested review from a team and removed request for cmatsuoka July 17, 2025 16:26
@mr-cal
Copy link
Contributor Author

mr-cal commented Jul 17, 2025

Will need an admin to change required workflows.

@bepri bepri requested a review from a team July 17, 2025 20:22
Copy link
Contributor

@upils upils left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The CLA check from starflow is already executed and marked as required, see https://github.com/canonical/craft-providers/actions/runs/16350565463/workflow?pr=778. What about deleting .github/workflows/cla-check.yaml then?

@mr-cal
Copy link
Contributor Author

mr-cal commented Jul 18, 2025

The CLA check from starflow is already executed and marked as required, see https://github.com/canonical/craft-providers/actions/runs/16350565463/workflow?pr=778. What about deleting .github/workflows/cla-check.yaml then?

Oh, interesting. Looks like this is running org-wide, not from starflow via .github/workflows/policy.yaml.

Looking at other repos with policy.yaml, the CLA check is running twice (example).

Signed-off-by: Callahan Kovacs <callahan.kovacs@canonical.com>
@mr-cal
Copy link
Contributor Author

mr-cal commented Jul 18, 2025

Upstream fix: canonical/starflow#64

@lengau lengau merged commit 5ba05e8 into main Jul 18, 2025
17 checks passed
@lengau lengau deleted the work/cla-check branch July 18, 2025 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants