fix: Replace the channel input with risk#275
Closed
MichaelThamm wants to merge 1 commit intofix/remove-channel-validationfrom
Closed
fix: Replace the channel input with risk#275MichaelThamm wants to merge 1 commit intofix/remove-channel-validationfrom
MichaelThamm wants to merge 1 commit intofix/remove-channel-validationfrom
Conversation
This was referenced Apr 17, 2026
Contributor
Author
|
Closing this PR in favor of: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
Since we need to move to workload tracks for charms, our product component (the charm TF modules) tracks will no longer be in sync. This means that the channel input is no longer useful in products and we really only care about risk.
Blocked by:
Solution
We can hardcode the tracks of the components e.g., 0.31 for alertmanager and 3.10 for prometheus in the module TF tag
3.0.n. The user should not have to concern themselves with what track of COS they want because this has caused confusion in the past i.e., the reason we added channel input validation, which is simplified if we only expose a risk.Checklist
Context
Keeping the channel input maintains backwards compatibility with COS < 3 so users have easier adoption, but this is giving users a false impression that they can choose a track with this input, but they cannot.
Testing Instructions
Upgrade Notes