Skip to content

gadget: use new boot chain#113

Merged
valentindavid merged 1 commit intocanonical:24from
valentindavid:valentindavid/new-boot-chain
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

gadget: use new boot chain#113
valentindavid merged 1 commit intocanonical:24from
valentindavid:valentindavid/new-boot-chain

Conversation

@valentindavid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@valentindavid valentindavid commented Apr 4, 2024

pc-gadget provides the shim boot chain for removable media. This is not the proper boot chain for an installed system.

The difference between boot chains is explained upstream: https://github.com/rhboot/shim/blob/main/README.fallback

This does not introduce the MOK manager yet.

This depends on snapd 2.63 because downgrade would require removing EFI/boot/fbx64.efi.

Depends on:

@alfonsosanchezbeato
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Is this equivalent to #107 , I assume?

@valentindavid valentindavid force-pushed the valentindavid/new-boot-chain branch from 8c27762 to 0e125d4 Compare June 24, 2024 11:47
@valentindavid valentindavid marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2024 12:02
@valentindavid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Is this equivalent to #107 , I assume?

Yes.

@valentindavid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Though the difference is this does not add the mokmanager.

pc-gadget provides the shim boot chain for removable media. This
is not the proper boot chain for an installed system.

The difference between boot chains is explained upstream:
https://github.com/rhboot/shim/blob/main/README.fallback

This does not introduce the MOK manager yet.

This depends on snapd 2.63 because downgrade would require removing
`EFI/boot/fbx64.efi`.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@alfonsosanchezbeato alfonsosanchezbeato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@alfonsosanchezbeato alfonsosanchezbeato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But, I think we need a "assumes" on the version of snapd that supports this before merging.

@valentindavid
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

But, I think we need a "assumes" on the version of snapd that supports this before merging.

It should already be there because of #116

@valentindavid valentindavid merged commit e5be435 into canonical:24 Jul 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants