Simplified strict typechecking #282
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
khieta
approved these changes
Aug 29, 2023
Contributor
khieta
left a comment
khieta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A few tiny comments. Most of my comments are on cedar-spec#111 because the spec is easier (for me) to read.
…le_strict_validation
…le_strict_validation
aaronjeline
reviewed
Sep 8, 2023
Contributor
aaronjeline
left a comment
aaronjeline
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems reasonable explained, as long as DRT passes.
aaronjeline
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2023
john-h-kastner-aws
deleted the
feature/jkastner/simple_strict_validation
branch
3 tasks
benelser
pushed a commit
to benelser/cedar
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
cedar-policy/rfcs#19
Issue #, if available
Checklist for requesting a review
The change in this PR is (choose one, and delete the other options):
cedar-policy(e.g., changes to the signature of an existing API).I confirm that this PR (choose one, and delete the other options):
I confirm that
cedar-spec(choose one, and delete the other options):cedar-spec, and how you have tested that your updates are correct.)Disclaimer
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.