Skip to content

Conversation

@stephanme
Copy link
Member

According to the rules for inactivity defined in RFC-0025, the following users should be removed from ARI approvers/reviewers/bots:

@KesavanKing
@pivotalgeorge
@xiujiao
@pyogesh2

According to the revocation policy in the RFC, users have two weeks to refute this revocation, if they wish by commenting on this pull-request and open a new pull-request to be re-added as approver after this one is merged.

Inactivity was detected by a github action, see #1359

…ithub.com/cloudfoundry/community/blob/main/toc/rfc/rfc-0025-define-criteria-and-removal-process-for-inactive-members.md), the following users should be removed from ARI approvers/reviewers/bots:

@KesavanKing
@pivotalgeorge
@xiujiao
@pyogesh2

According to the [revocation policy in the RFC](https://github.com/cloudfoundry/community/blob/main/toc/rfc/rfc-0025-define-criteria-and-removal-process-for-inactive-members.md#remove-the-membership-to-the-cloud-foundry-github-organization), users have two weeks to refute this revocation, if they wish by commenting on this pull-request and open a new pull-request to be re-added as approver after this one is merged.

Inactivity was detected by a github action, see #1359
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Status: Inbox

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants