Remove and add gibberish entries in JSON #7

DanielOrge · 2025-11-04T12:11:15Z

No description provided.

codacy-production · 2025-11-04T12:11:23Z

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00% (target: -100.00%)	✅ ∅ (target: 0.00%)

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (`070413c`)	30	25	83.33%
Head commit (`e22510c`)	30 (+0)	25 (+0)	83.33% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#7)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:27Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2025-64458: Django: Denial-of-service vulnerability in Django on Windows) (update to 4.2.26)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter pertains to a denial-of-service vulnerability in Django version 1.11.29, which can be exploited on Windows systems. This vulnerability is documented under CVE-2025-64458 and poses a risk to applications using this version of Django. To mitigate this security risk, it is recommended to upgrade to a more recent, secure version of Django, specifically version 4.2.26 or later.

To address this vulnerability, you can update the Django version in your requirements file with the following code suggestion:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.26

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:28Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29
+requests==2.19.1


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/requests@2.19.1 (CVE-2024-35195: requests: subsequent requests to the same host ignore cert verification) (update to 2.32.0)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is related to a security vulnerability in the requests library version 2.19.1, specifically CVE-2024-35195. This vulnerability allows subsequent requests to the same host to ignore certificate verification, which can expose applications to man-in-the-middle attacks and other security risks.

To mitigate this security issue, you should update the requests library to a version that has fixed the vulnerability. The recommended version is 2.32.0 or higher.

Here is the code suggestion to fix the issue:

Suggested change

requests==2.19.1

requests==2.32.0

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:28Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2025-57833: django: Django SQL injection in FilteredRelation column aliases) (update to 4.2.24)

The issue identified by Trivy relates to a security vulnerability in Django version 1.11.29, specifically a SQL injection vulnerability associated with FilteredRelation column aliases (CVE-2025-57833). This vulnerability could potentially allow an attacker to manipulate SQL queries and gain unauthorized access to the database or sensitive data.

To mitigate this security risk, it is recommended to upgrade Django to a secure version, as suggested by Trivy. The recommended version is 4.2.24, which addresses the vulnerability.

Here’s the code suggestion to update the Django version:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.24

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:29Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2024-45231: python-django: Potential user email enumeration via response status on password reset) (update to 4.2.16)

The issue identified by Trivy is a security vulnerability in the specified version of Django (1.11.29). The vulnerability, listed under CVE-2024-45231, relates to a potential user email enumeration issue that can occur during the password reset process. This could allow an attacker to determine whether a specific email address is registered in the system based on the response status from the server, thereby compromising user privacy.

To mitigate this vulnerability, it is recommended to upgrade Django to a more secure version, specifically to 4.2.16 or later, which contains the necessary patches to address this issue.

Here’s the code suggestion to fix the issue by updating the Django version:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.16

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:30Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2021-33203: django: Potential directory traversal via admindocs) (update to 2.2.24)

The issue identified by Trivy relates to a security vulnerability in Django version 1.11.29, specifically CVE-2021-33203. This vulnerability allows for potential directory traversal through the admindocs feature, which could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive files on the server. It is recommended to update to a more secure version of Django to mitigate this risk.

To resolve this issue, you should update the Django version to at least 2.2.24, which addresses the vulnerability. Here’s the code suggestion to make that change:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==2.2.24

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:31Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


❌ Codacy found a critical Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2025-64459: django: Django SQL injection) (update to 4.2.26)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter pertains to a security vulnerability in the Django version specified in your dependencies. Specifically, the version 1.11.29 is affected by a SQL injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-64459). This means that if your application uses this version of Django, it could be susceptible to attacks that exploit this vulnerability, potentially allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL code against your database.

To mitigate this security risk, it is recommended to upgrade to a more secure version of Django. The suggested version provided by the linter is 4.2.26, which presumably has addressed the vulnerabilities present in earlier versions.

Here’s the single line change you should make to your dependency list:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.26

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:31Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/flask@1.0.2 (CVE-2023-30861: flask: Possible disclosure of permanent session cookie due to missing Vary: Cookie header) (update to 2.2.5)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter pertains to a security vulnerability in Flask version 1.0.2, specifically CVE-2023-30861. This vulnerability could potentially allow for the disclosure of a permanent session cookie due to the absence of a Vary: Cookie header. This could lead to session hijacking or other security risks if the application is not properly secured against such attacks.

To mitigate this vulnerability, it is recommended to upgrade Flask to a more secure version, as suggested by the linter. The recommended version is 2.2.5, which includes the necessary security fixes.

Here is the code suggestion to fix the issue:

Suggested change

flask==1.0.2

flask==2.2.5

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:32Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29
+requests==2.19.1


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/requests@2.19.1 (CVE-2024-47081: requests: Requests vulnerable to .netrc credentials leak via malicious URLs) (update to 2.32.4)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is a security vulnerability in the requests library version 2.19.1. Specifically, it relates to a potential leak of .netrc credentials when handling malicious URLs, which could allow an attacker to access sensitive information. This vulnerability is documented under CVE-2024-47081. To mitigate this risk, it's recommended to update the requests library to a secure version, specifically version 2.32.4 or later.

To fix the issue, you should update the version of the requests library in your requirements file. Here’s the suggested change:

Suggested change

requests==2.19.1

requests==2.32.4

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:33Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2025-48432: django: Django Path Injection Vulnerability) (update to 4.2.22)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is a security vulnerability in Django version 1.11.29, specifically a Path Injection Vulnerability (CVE-2025-48432). This vulnerability could allow an attacker to manipulate file paths, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive files or directories within the application. Since Django 1.11 is an older version and no longer actively maintained, it is crucial to upgrade to a more recent and secure version.

To resolve this issue, you should update the Django dependency to a safe and supported version, such as 4.2.22. This will help mitigate the security risk associated with the identified vulnerability.

Here is the suggested code change:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.22

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:34Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/django@1.11.29 (CVE-2022-36359: An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 b ...) (update to 3.2.15)

The issue reported by the Trivy linter indicates that the version of Django specified in your requirements (django==1.11.29) is vulnerable to a security issue identified by CVE-2022-36359. This vulnerability affects the HTTP FileResponse class in Django and could potentially allow an attacker to exploit the application in certain scenarios. The recommended action is to update Django to a more secure version, specifically to 3.2.15 or later.

To fix this issue, you should update the version of Django in your requirements file. Here’s the single line change you can make:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==3.2.15

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-11-13T12:04:35Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29
+requests==2.19.1


⚠️ Codacy found a medium Security issue: Insecure dependency pypi/requests@2.19.1 (CVE-2023-32681: python-requests: Unintended leak of Proxy-Authorization header) (update to 2.31.0)

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is a security vulnerability in the requests library version 2.19.1. Specifically, it relates to CVE-2023-32681, which describes an unintended leak of the Proxy-Authorization header. This vulnerability could potentially expose sensitive information if an application using this version of the requests library interacts with a proxy server.

To resolve this issue, you should update the version of the requests library to a secure version that does not contain this vulnerability. The recommended version to upgrade to is 2.31.0.

Here's the code suggestion to fix the issue:

Suggested change

requests==2.19.1

requests==2.31.0

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:52:11Z

Codacy's Analysis Summary

12 new issues (≤ 0 medium issue)
12 new security issues (≤ 0 issue)
0 complexity (≤ 20 gate)
0 duplications (≤ 1 gate)

Review Pull Request in Codacy →

✨ AI Reviewer available: add the codacy-review label to get contextual insights without leaving GitHub.

codacy-production

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces 12 new security vulnerabilities related to insecure dependencies (Flask, Django, Requests) as reported by Codacy. These are high-severity issues and should be addressed before merging. Additionally, the whaddayamean.json file is not valid JSON.

About this PR

The PR title 'Remove and add gibberish entries in JSON' is vague and doesn't accurately reflect the significant changes, such as the introduction of a requirements.txt file with vulnerable dependencies and updates to the CI/CD workflow. Please update the title to be more descriptive.
The PR description is empty. Providing a clear description of the changes, their purpose, and any design considerations helps reviewers understand the intent and impact of the PR.

💡 Codacy uses AI. Check for mistakes.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:52:34Z

whaddayamean.json

 }
 - gibberish
 - more gibberish
+- extra gibberish
 {


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

The whaddayamean.json file is not valid JSON. JSON objects should start with { and end with }. The current structure (} then {) and the unquoted gibberish entries will cause parsing errors. If this file is meant to be JSON, it needs to be properly formatted. If it's not JSON, its purpose should be clarified.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:52:34Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29
+requests==2.19.1


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

Codacy identified an insecure dependency: Requests version 2.19.1 has a high-severity vulnerability (CVE-2018-18074) related to Authorization header leakage on HTTPS to HTTP redirects. Update to a secure version (e.g., 2.20.0 or newer).

This might be a simple fix:

Suggested change

requests==2.19.1

requests==2.20.0

See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:52:34Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

Codacy identified an insecure dependency: Django version 1.11.29 has a high-severity issue (CVE-2022-36359) in the HTTP FileResponse class. Update to a secure version (e.g., 3.2.15 or newer).

This might be a simple fix:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==3.2.15

See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:52:34Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

Codacy identified an insecure dependency: Django version 1.11.29 has a high-severity denial-of-service vulnerability (CVE-2025-64458) on Windows. Update to a secure version (e.g., 4.2.26 or newer).

This might be a simple fix:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.26

See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:52:34Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

Codacy identified an insecure dependency: Django version 1.11.29 has a high-severity SQL injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-57833). Update to a secure version (e.g., 4.2.24 or newer).

This might be a simple fix:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.24

See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:52:34Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

Codacy identified an insecure dependency: Django version 1.11.29 has a critical-severity SQL injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-64459). Update to a secure version (e.g., 4.2.26 or newer).

This might be a simple fix:

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.26

See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:52:34Z

python/requirements.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

Codacy identified an insecure dependency: Flask version 1.0.2 has a high-severity vulnerability (CVE-2023-30861) related to a possible disclosure of a permanent session cookie. Update to a secure version (e.g., 2.2.5 or newer).

This might be a simple fix:

Suggested change

flask==1.0.2

flask==2.2.5

See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:52:35Z

.github/workflows/codacy.yml

+        - '*.yaml'
+  merge_group:
+    types:
+      - checks_requested # this is the one that's isn't triggering Codacy analysis


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

The comment # this is the one that's isn't triggering Codacy analysis indicates an issue with the merge_group trigger. If merge_group is intended to trigger Codacy analysis, this problem needs to be investigated and resolved to ensure proper continuous integration for merge queue workflows.

codacy-production · 2025-12-05T10:52:35Z

.github/workflows/codacy.yml

+    branches:
+      - master


_{🟡 MEDIUM RISK}

Suggestion: Changing the push trigger from branches: [ '*' ] to branches: [ 'master' ] will prevent the workflow from running on pushes to other branches. If the intent is for pushes to feature branches to also trigger the workflow, this change might be too restrictive. Please clarify the intended behavior.

Remove and add gibberish entries in JSON

c69fa41

DanielOrge added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 4, 2025

github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Nov 4, 2025

heliocodacy and others added 7 commits November 4, 2025 12:41

add-requirements

ce26c19

Add CI/CD workflow configuration for main branch

987031a

Update pipeline

4957d52

n/A

b6e70c0

fix paths on codacy.yml

33eda70

main branch is master...

ebe64ce

Merge branch 'master' into DanielOrge-patch-1

e22510c

codacy-production bot reviewed Nov 13, 2025

View reviewed changes

claudia-codacy added the codacy-review Trigger Codacy's AI reviewer label Dec 5, 2025

codacy-production bot reviewed Dec 5, 2025

View reviewed changes

codacy-acme deleted a comment from codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Remove and add gibberish entries in JSON #7

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Remove and add gibberish entries in JSON #7

Uh oh!

Conversation

DanielOrge commented Nov 4, 2025

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot commented Nov 4, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot commented Dec 5, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codacy's Analysis Summary

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

About this PR

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production bot Dec 5, 2025

codacy-production bot commented Nov 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codacy-production bot commented Dec 5, 2025 •

edited

Loading