Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Dec 3, 2025

📄 10% (0.10x) speedup for build_eval_function in inference/core/workflows/core_steps/common/query_language/evaluation_engine/core.py

⏱️ Runtime : 86.2 microseconds 78.1 microseconds (best of 6 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimized code achieves a 10% speedup through several key micro-optimizations that reduce function call overhead and attribute lookups:

Key optimizations:

  1. Replaced isinstance() with direct type() comparisons in build_eval_function: The original code used isinstance(definition, BinaryStatement) which is more expensive than type(definition) is BinaryStatement_type. This optimization assumes no subclassing is used, which is common in query language evaluation engines.

  2. Eliminated redundant loops with list comprehension for StatementGroup processing: Instead of explicitly creating an empty list and appending in a loop, the optimized version uses a list comprehension that's more efficient in Python.

  3. Reduced repeated attribute lookups in build_binary_statement and build_unary_statement: The original code called definition.comparator.type and type(definition.comparator).model_fields multiple times. The optimized version stores these in local variables (comparator, model_fields) to avoid repeated lookups.

  4. Minor optimization in compound_eval: Eliminated an intermediate variable assignment by directly passing fun(values) to operator_fun().

Performance impact: The line profiler shows that build_eval_function execution time dropped from 940.64μs to 821.41μs, with the most significant gains in the type checking logic (31.4% → 12.9% of total time for the first isinstance check).

Context benefits: Since build_eval_function is called recursively for nested statement groups and is used in the main evaluate() function that processes query language definitions, these micro-optimizations compound when processing complex nested queries. The function appears to be in a hot path for query language evaluation, making these small gains meaningful for overall system performance.

Test case suitability: These optimizations are particularly effective for workloads with deeply nested statement groups or frequent query evaluations, where the recursive calls to build_eval_function amplify the performance benefits.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 6 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 88.9%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
workflows/unit_tests/core_steps/control_flow/test_control_flow.py::test_continue_if_evaluation 86.2μs 78.1μs 10.4%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-build_eval_function-miqkpu8h and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimized code achieves a **10% speedup** through several key micro-optimizations that reduce function call overhead and attribute lookups:

**Key optimizations:**

1. **Replaced `isinstance()` with direct `type()` comparisons** in `build_eval_function`: The original code used `isinstance(definition, BinaryStatement)` which is more expensive than `type(definition) is BinaryStatement_type`. This optimization assumes no subclassing is used, which is common in query language evaluation engines.

2. **Eliminated redundant loops with list comprehension** for StatementGroup processing: Instead of explicitly creating an empty list and appending in a loop, the optimized version uses a list comprehension that's more efficient in Python.

3. **Reduced repeated attribute lookups** in `build_binary_statement` and `build_unary_statement`: The original code called `definition.comparator.type` and `type(definition.comparator).model_fields` multiple times. The optimized version stores these in local variables (`comparator`, `model_fields`) to avoid repeated lookups.

4. **Minor optimization in `compound_eval`**: Eliminated an intermediate variable assignment by directly passing `fun(values)` to `operator_fun()`.

**Performance impact:** The line profiler shows that `build_eval_function` execution time dropped from 940.64μs to 821.41μs, with the most significant gains in the type checking logic (31.4% → 12.9% of total time for the first isinstance check).

**Context benefits:** Since `build_eval_function` is called recursively for nested statement groups and is used in the main `evaluate()` function that processes query language definitions, these micro-optimizations compound when processing complex nested queries. The function appears to be in a hot path for query language evaluation, making these small gains meaningful for overall system performance.

**Test case suitability:** These optimizations are particularly effective for workloads with deeply nested statement groups or frequent query evaluations, where the recursive calls to `build_eval_function` amplify the performance benefits.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 December 3, 2025 22:23
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Dec 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant