Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Dec 4, 2025

📄 145% (1.45x) speedup for LRUCache.get in inference/core/cache/lru_cache.py

⏱️ Runtime : 5.29 microseconds 2.16 microseconds (best of 27 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization achieves a 144% speedup by replacing an expensive try/except pattern with a more efficient conditional check for cache lookups.

Key optimizations applied:

  1. Eliminated expensive .pop() operation: The original code used self.cache.pop(key) followed by self.cache[key] = value to move the key to the end of the OrderedDict. This approach requires removing and re-inserting the key-value pair, which is costly for OrderedDict operations.

  2. Used .move_to_end() method: The optimized version leverages OrderedDict's built-in .move_to_end(key) method, which efficiently updates the ordering without removing and re-inserting the entry.

  3. Replaced try/except with conditional check: Changed from exception handling (try/except KeyError) to a simple membership test (if key in self.cache), avoiding the overhead of exception creation and handling when keys are missing.

Performance impact analysis:

  • The line profiler shows the original code spent 58.4% of time in the .pop() operation alone
  • The optimized version reduces total execution time from 14.462μs to 6.319μs
  • Cache miss scenarios (testing non-existent keys) show particularly strong improvements: 148-204% faster according to the annotated tests

Why this optimization works:
In Python, exception handling has significant overhead, especially when exceptions are frequently raised. For cache implementations where cache misses are common, avoiding KeyError exceptions provides substantial performance benefits. Additionally, OrderedDict's .move_to_end() is specifically optimized for LRU cache patterns, making it much more efficient than manual pop/reassign operations.

This optimization is especially valuable for cache-heavy workloads where frequent lookups of missing keys occur, as evidenced by the strong performance gains in the "empty cache" and "missing key" test scenarios.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 124 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 6 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 66.7%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
inference/unit_tests/usage_tracking/test_collector.py::test_record_usage_with_exception_on_GCP 349ns 348ns 0.287%✅
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import collections
import random
import string

# imports
import pytest
from inference.core.cache.lru_cache import LRUCache

# unit tests

# ----------------------------
# Basic Test Cases
# ----------------------------


def test_get_on_empty_cache_returns_none():
    # Test that get returns None when cache is empty
    cache = LRUCache(2)
    codeflash_output = cache.get("x")  # 2.02μs -> 665ns (204% faster)
import collections

# imports
import pytest
from inference.core.cache.lru_cache import LRUCache

# unit tests

# ---------------------------
# Basic Test Cases
# ---------------------------


def test_get_non_existing_key_returns_none():
    # Test that get returns None for a missing key
    cache = LRUCache(capacity=2)
    codeflash_output = cache.get("missing")  # 1.56μs -> 598ns (160% faster)


def test_get_on_empty_cache():
    # Test get on a cache that has never had any items
    cache = LRUCache(capacity=2)
    codeflash_output = cache.get("foo")  # 1.36μs -> 550ns (148% faster)

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-LRUCache.get-miqoz0o7 and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization achieves a **144% speedup** by replacing an expensive `try/except` pattern with a more efficient conditional check for cache lookups.

**Key optimizations applied:**

1. **Eliminated expensive `.pop()` operation**: The original code used `self.cache.pop(key)` followed by `self.cache[key] = value` to move the key to the end of the OrderedDict. This approach requires removing and re-inserting the key-value pair, which is costly for OrderedDict operations.

2. **Used `.move_to_end()` method**: The optimized version leverages OrderedDict's built-in `.move_to_end(key)` method, which efficiently updates the ordering without removing and re-inserting the entry.

3. **Replaced try/except with conditional check**: Changed from exception handling (`try/except KeyError`) to a simple membership test (`if key in self.cache`), avoiding the overhead of exception creation and handling when keys are missing.

**Performance impact analysis:**
- The line profiler shows the original code spent 58.4% of time in the `.pop()` operation alone
- The optimized version reduces total execution time from 14.462μs to 6.319μs
- Cache miss scenarios (testing non-existent keys) show particularly strong improvements: 148-204% faster according to the annotated tests

**Why this optimization works:**
In Python, exception handling has significant overhead, especially when exceptions are frequently raised. For cache implementations where cache misses are common, avoiding KeyError exceptions provides substantial performance benefits. Additionally, OrderedDict's `.move_to_end()` is specifically optimized for LRU cache patterns, making it much more efficient than manual pop/reassign operations.

This optimization is especially valuable for cache-heavy workloads where frequent lookups of missing keys occur, as evidenced by the strong performance gains in the "empty cache" and "missing key" test scenarios.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 December 4, 2025 00:22
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Dec 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant