⚡️ Speed up function compute_take_along_axis_output_shape by 25%
#162
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 25% (0.25x) speedup for
compute_take_along_axis_output_shapeinkeras/src/ops/operation_utils.py⏱️ Runtime :
125 microseconds→100 microseconds(best of77runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 24% speedup through two key optimizations that reduce computational overhead in shape broadcasting operations:
What was optimized:
Eliminated unnecessary list copying in
broadcast_shapes: Instead of creatingoutput_shape = list(shape1)and then modifying elements via indexing, the optimized version buildsoutput_shape = []directly usingappend()operations while iterating withzip(shape1, shape2).Replaced expensive
np.prod()with manual multiplication: Incompute_take_along_axis_output_shape, whenaxis is None, the code now uses a simple loop to calculate the product instead of callingnp.prod(input_shape), which has overhead from NumPy's C API and type conversions.Why these optimizations work:
List building vs. copying: Python's
list.append()is more efficient than list copying + indexing when most elements will be replaced. Thezip()approach also eliminates repeatedlen()calls and index bounds checking.Manual product calculation: For small lists (typical in shape operations), a simple Python loop with
prod *= dis faster than NumPy'sprod()function, which has significant overhead for small arrays due to function call costs and type checking.Performance impact:
The function is called from
take_along_axisin TensorFlow backend operations, making it part of tensor manipulation hot paths. The test results show consistent 2-10% improvements across most test cases, with the largest gains (up to 623% in one edge case) when avoiding thenp.prod()call. Since tensor shape operations are fundamental to deep learning frameworks, these micro-optimizations compound across many operations to deliver meaningful performance gains.The optimizations are particularly effective for typical ML workloads involving 2D-4D tensors with small dimension counts, where the overhead reduction becomes proportionally significant.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-compute_take_along_axis_output_shape-mirg1qieand push.