⚡️ Speed up method DPTImageProcessor.pad_image by 87%
#875
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 87% (0.87x) speedup for
DPTImageProcessor.pad_imageinsrc/transformers/models/dpt/image_processing_dpt.py⏱️ Runtime :
4.92 milliseconds→2.64 milliseconds(best of21runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves an 86% speedup through several key optimizations focused on reducing computational overhead in image padding operations:
Key Optimizations Applied
1. Zero-Padding Fast Path in
pad()FunctionThe most significant optimization adds an early exit for zero-padding cases. When padding values are all zeros, the function now:
is_zero_pad()np.pad()2. Streamlined
infer_channel_dimension_format()num_channelsassignment into a single chained conditional expression, eliminating redundant checksimage.shapeonce and reuse it, reducing attribute access overheadfirst_in_channelsandlast_in_channelsresults to avoid repeatedinoperations3. Optimized
_expand_for_data_format()isinstancechecksWhy These Optimizations Work
Zero-padding optimization: The test results show dramatic speedups (500-5000% faster) for cases where no padding is needed, which is common when images are already properly sized. The line profiler shows
np.pad()consumes 89-95% of execution time, so bypassing it entirely provides massive gains.Reduced function call overhead: By caching shape access and minimizing repeated computations in
infer_channel_dimension_format(), the optimization reduces the cumulative cost of this frequently-called function.Test Case Performance
The optimizations excel in scenarios where:
size_divisorsee 500-1800% speedupsnp.pad()callsThe optimization maintains correctness while providing substantial performance improvements for the common case where padding isn't actually needed.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-DPTImageProcessor.pad_image-misgpf9kand push.