✨ Add server webhooks #4
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve the introduction and modification of TypeScript interfaces and export structures across multiple files related to webhook events for pull requests, repositories, and projects. New interfaces define the structure of data for various events, including comments added, deleted, or edited, pull request status changes, and project modifications. Additionally, the export statements have been updated to streamline access to these entities, promoting a more organized module structure. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Webhook
participant Server
participant Repository
participant Project
User->>Webhook: Trigger Event (e.g., PR Comment Added)
Webhook->>Server: Send Event Data
Server->>Repository: Process Event
Repository->>Server: Acknowledge Processing
Server->>Project: Update Project Status
Project->>Server: Confirm Update
Server->>Webhook: Acknowledge Receipt
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
src/server/webhooks/index.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM, but be mindful of potential naming conflicts.The wildcard export promotes a more organized module structure by re-exporting all entities from a single entry point. However, be cautious of potential naming conflicts that could arise from this approach.
Consider using named exports instead of wildcard exports to avoid potential naming conflicts. For example:
export { CommentAddedEvent, CommentDeletedEvent, CommentEditedEvent } from "./events/index.js";
2-2: LGTM, but be mindful of potential naming conflicts.The wildcard export promotes a more organized module structure by re-exporting all entities from a single entry point. However, be cautious of potential naming conflicts that could arise from this approach.
Consider using named exports instead of wildcard exports to avoid potential naming conflicts. For example:
export { WebhookHeaders } from "./headers.js";src/server/webhooks/events/project/event.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM, eh!The types are defined clearly and the naming follows a consistent convention. The JSDoc comment is also helpful.
The
ProjectEventKeytype alias is a bit redundant since it's just an alias forProjectModified["eventKey"]. Consider whether it's really needed or if usingProjectModified["eventKey"]directly would suffice. But if it improves readability and maintainability where it's used, then feel free to keep it as is.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_deleted.ts (2)
11-20: Consider using more specific types, eh.The
Commentinterface looks good overall, but there are a couple of suggestions:
The
commentsandtasksproperties are of typeunknown[]. If possible, consider using more specific types for these properties to improve type safety and code readability.The
createdDateandupdatedDateproperties are of typenumber. If these properties represent dates, consider using theDatetype instead for better semantics and type safety.
32-43: Great work defining the event payload, eh!The
RepoCommentDeletedinterface accurately captures the structure of the repo comment deleted event payload. The property names are descriptive, and the types are appropriately used.One suggestion:
- For the
dateproperty, consider using a more specific type, such asDateor a custom type that represents a formatted date string, to improve type safety and code readability.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/opened.ts (1)
39-56: Looks great, eh!The
PullRequestinterface comprehensively captures the details of a pull request. The properties are well-typed, and the relationships with other interfaces are established correctly.Regarding the
participantsandreviewersproperties, consider defining their structures using dedicated interfaces if their shapes are known and consistent. This can provide better type safety and code completion. If they are intentionally left flexible, the currentunknown[]type is appropriate.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_edited.ts (1)
11-22: The interface looks good overall, but consider defining stricter types for some properties.The
Commentinterface is well-structured with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. Marking all properties as readonly ensures immutability, which is great!However, using
unknown[]for thecommentsandtasksproperties could potentially lead to type safety issues. If possible, consider defining stricter types for these properties to improve type checking and catch potential bugs early.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/deleted.ts (1)
37-53: LGTM, but consider defining a specific type for theparticipantsproperty.The
PullRequestinterface looks good overall. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations. Nice job reusing theAuthorandRefinterfaces for theauthor,fromRef,toRef, andreviewersproperties.However, the
participantsproperty is of typeunknown[], which is a bit concerning. It's better to have a specific type for this property, even if it's a custom type likeParticipant[]. This will provide better type safety and make the code more readable.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/declined.ts (1)
37-54: Looks great overall, eh!The
PullRequestinterface has clear and descriptive property names. Making all properties read-only is a solid practice to prevent unintended mutations. Using theAuthortype for theauthorproperty and thereviewersarray, and theReftype for thefromRefandtoRefproperties promotes code reuse and maintains consistency.Consider providing a specific type for the
participantsproperty.If possible, provide a specific type for the
participantsproperty instead of usingunknown. This will improve type safety and provide better editor support.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/merged.ts (1)
46-64: Consider defining a specific type for thereviewersproperty.The
PullRequestinterface looks good overall. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations. The composition of theAuthor,Ref, andPropertiesinterfaces is also a good design choice.However, the
reviewersproperty is of typeunknown[], which is a bit concerning. It would be better to have a specific type for this property, even if it's just a simple interface with a few properties. This would make the code more readable and maintainable.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_changes_requested.ts (1)
34-78: The interfaces look good overall, but consider making theparticipantsproperty more specific.The
Project,Ref, andRepositoryinterfaces look good with their mix of basic data types and other interfaces.For the
PullRequestinterface, theparticipantsproperty is of typeunknown[], which could be more specific. If the structure of a participant is known, consider defining an interface for it and using that instead.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_deleted.ts (2)
18-27: Consider using more specific types for thecommentsandtasksproperties.The
Commentinterface is well-defined with clear and descriptive property names, appropriate types, andreadonlymodifiers to ensure immutability. The use of theActorinterface for theauthorproperty promotes code reuse and modularity.However, the
commentsandtasksproperties are of typeunknown[], which may not provide enough type safety. If possible, consider using more specific types for these properties to improve type checking and catch potential errors at compile-time.
52-68: Consider using more specific types for theparticipantsandreviewersproperties.The
PullRequestinterface is well-defined with clear and descriptive property names, appropriate types, andreadonlymodifiers to ensure immutability. The use of theAuthorinterface for theauthorproperty and theRefinterface for thefromRefandtoRefproperties promotes code reuse and modularity.However, the
participantsandreviewersproperties are of typeunknown[], which may not provide enough type safety. If possible, consider using more specific types for these properties to improve type checking and catch potential errors at compile-time.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/from_ref_updated.ts (1)
48-65: LGTM, but consider using more specific types forparticipantsandreviewers.The
PullRequestinterface looks good overall. The read-only properties cover essential details about a pull request, and the naming is clear and concise.However, the
participantsandreviewersproperties are of typeunknown[], which may not provide enough type safety. Consider using more specific types for these properties if possible, such asUser[]orReviewer[], depending on the shape of the data.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/modified.ts (2)
18-32: LGTM with a suggestion!The
PRModifiedinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, read-only modifiers, and a string literal type for theeventKeyproperty to ensure type safety.The JSDoc comments provide useful information about some properties, but it would be even better to add comments for the remaining properties to improve code documentation and maintainability.
50-67: LGTM with a suggestion!The
PullRequestinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to ensure immutability.However, the
participantsproperty is of typeunknown[], which could lead to type safety issues and make the code harder to maintain. If possible, consider specifying a more specific type for this property to improve type safety and code maintainability.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_edited.ts (2)
18-28: Consider improving the typing ofcommentsandtasksproperties if possible.The
Commentinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to ensure immutability. Theauthorandpropertiesproperties are correctly typed, promoting type safety and code reuse.However, the
commentsandtasksproperties are typed asunknown[], which doesn't provide any type safety. If possible, consider defining specific types for these properties to improve type safety and code readability.
46-93: Consider improving the typing ofparticipantsandreviewersproperties inPullRequestinterface if possible.The
Project,Properties,PullRequest,Ref, andRepositoryinterfaces are well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to ensure immutability. The interfaces are correctly linked together through appropriate typing of properties, promoting type safety and code reuse.However, the
participantsandreviewersproperties inPullRequestinterface are typed asunknown[], which doesn't provide any type safety. If possible, consider defining specific types for these properties to improve type safety and code readability.src/server/webhooks/headers.ts (1)
1-60: TheBitbucketServerWebhookHeadersinterface is well-defined and documented. Great job!A few suggestions to enhance the interface:
Consider adding a link to the
EventKeytype definition in the comment for theX-Event-Keyproperty. This will make it easier for developers to navigate to the related type.For the optional
Authorizationproperty, it's important to handle cases where it may be undefined. When consuming this interface, you can use optional chaining or provide a default value to avoid potential runtime errors. For example:const credentials = headers.Authorization ?? 'default_credentials';Overall, the interface follows best practices and provides clear documentation for its properties. The comments are helpful in understanding the purpose and usage of each header, especially for the security-related headers.
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_updated.ts (3)
25-26: Update the comment forpullRequestto remove "created"The comment for
pullRequestreads, "Details of the pull request created." Since this event pertains to an existing pull request where reviewers have been updated, it's clearer to simply say, "Details of the pull request."
41-48: Consolidateopenandclosedproperties to prevent ambiguityHaving both
openandclosedboolean properties could lead to confusion or contradictions if their values become inconsistent. Consider replacing them with a singlestateproperty that reflects the current status of the pull request. For example:readonly state: 'OPEN' | 'MERGED' | 'DECLINED'This approach reduces redundancy and improves the clarity of the pull request's status.
35-35: Avoid usingtypeas a property name to prevent keyword conflictsUsing
typeas a property name may lead to potential conflicts with TypeScript's reserved keywordtype. Consider renaming these properties to more descriptive identifiers such asentityType,projectType, orrepositoryTypeto enhance code readability and prevent issues during compilation.Also applies to: 36-36, 73-73
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (33)
- src/server/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/event.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_added.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_deleted.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_edited.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/declined.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/deleted.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/event.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/from_ref_updated.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/merged.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/modified.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/opened.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_approved.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_changes_requested.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_unapproved.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_updated.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/project/event.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/project/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/project/modified.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_added.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_deleted.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_edited.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/event.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/forked.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/modified.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/refs_changed.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/secret_detected.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/synchronized.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/headers.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/index.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (113)
src/server/webhooks/events/project/index.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM!The export statement is using the correct syntax to re-export all entities from
./event.js. This is a common pattern used to create a single entry point for a module.
2-2: LGTM!The export statement is using the correct syntax to re-export all entities from
./modified.js. This is a common pattern used to create a single entry point for a module.src/server/index.ts (2)
2-2: Looks good, eh!The updated export statement simplifies the export structure by directly exporting all entities from
./openapi/index.jswithout the intermediaryservernamespace. This change promotes a more straightforward and direct access to the exported entities from theopenapimodule.
3-3: Nice addition, eh!The new export statement allows direct access to the contents of the
webhooksmodule. This change aligns with the overall goal of promoting a more straightforward export structure.src/server/webhooks/events/index.ts (1)
1-4: LGTM!The use of
export *andexport * asstatements to re-export the named exports from various event-related modules is a clean and effective way to organize the module structure. It allows importing the exported members using shorter and more descriptive aliases, which can improve code readability.The changes look good to me!
src/server/webhooks/events/event.ts (1)
1-9: LGTM!The code segment is well-structured and follows best practices for defining types in TypeScript. The
EventandEventKeytypes provide a clear and concise way to represent different types of events in the codebase, promoting type safety and making it easier to work with events in a type-safe manner.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/index.ts (1)
1-9: LGTM, eh!The exports are well-organized and provide a clean way to access the various webhook event-related entities. The use of
export * fromsyntax ensures that any changes to the exported entities in the respective modules are automatically reflected in this file, which is great for maintainability.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/index.ts (1)
1-13: LGTM, eh!This file provides a clean and organized way to access webhook event-related entities from a single entry point. The export statements are well-structured and follow a consistent naming convention, which promotes better code organization and easier maintainability.
src/server/webhooks/events/project/modified.ts (3)
1-9: Looks good, eh!The
Actorinterface has clear and descriptive property names. Making all properties read-only is a solid practice to prevent unintended changes.
11-17: Beauty, eh!The
Projectinterface looks perfect. The read-only properties with clear names make it easy to understand and use safely.
19-30: Looks great, eh!The
ProjectModifiedinterface provides a clear structure for the "project:modified" event payload. The JSDoc comment is helpful, and extending theProjectinterface for thenewandoldproperties promotes reusability. Nice work!src/server/webhooks/events/repo/event.ts (2)
1-9: Imports are well-organized and follow a consistent naming convention.The imports are clearly named based on the specific repository events they represent, making the code more readable and maintainable. Great job!
10-28: Union types for repository events and event keys are well-defined and documented.The
RepoEventandRepoEventKeyunion types provide a clear and convenient way to represent all possible repository events and their corresponding event keys. The JSDoc comment forRepoEventis a nice touch, providing helpful documentation. The consistent formatting of the union types enhances readability. Well done!src/server/webhooks/events/repo/modified.ts (4)
1-9: LGTM!The
Actorinterface looks good. The properties are well-defined, appropriately typed, and marked as readonly.
11-17: LGTM!The
Projectinterface looks good. The properties are well-defined, appropriately typed, and marked as readonly.
19-30: LGTM!The
RepoModifiedinterface looks good. The properties are well-defined, appropriately typed, and marked as readonly. The JSDoc comment provides helpful context about the event.
32-42: LGTM!The
Repositoryinterface looks good. The properties are well-defined, appropriately typed, and marked as readonly.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/forked.ts (5)
1-9: Looks good, eh!The
Actorinterface has clear and descriptive properties. Making them all read-only is a solid practice to prevent unintended changes.
11-21: Beauty, eh!The
Origininterface looks great with its clear and descriptive read-only properties. It captures the essential details of an origin repository.
23-30: Spot on, bud!The
Projectinterface looks solid with its clear and descriptive properties. Havingownerandpublicas optional properties provides nice flexibility.
32-42: Right on, eh!The
RepoForkedinterface looks perfect with its clear and descriptive read-only properties. The JSDoc comments are a beauty, providing helpful context about the interface and theactorproperty. Great job there, bud!
44-56: Looks great, eh!The
Repositoryinterface is spot on with its clear and descriptive read-only properties. It captures all the essential details of a repository quite nicely.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_deleted.ts (2)
1-9: Looks good, eh!The
Actorinterface is well-defined with appropriate property names and types. The use ofreadonlymodifier ensures immutability, which is a great practice.
22-28: Looks great, eh!The
Projectinterface is well-structured with appropriate property names and types. The use ofreadonlymodifier ensures immutability, which is an excellent practice.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/secret_detected.ts (4)
1-15: Looks good, eh!The
Actorinterface is well-defined with appropriate properties and data types. The read-only modifier ensures immutability, which is a solid practice. The naming of the properties is clear and follows the camelCase convention. Beauty!
17-23: Looks great, eh!The
Projectinterface is well-structured with relevant properties and data types. The read-only modifier ensures immutability, which is a solid practice. The naming of the properties is clear and follows the camelCase convention. Nicely done!
27-34: Looks fantastic, eh!The
RepoSecretDetectedinterface is well-designed with relevant properties and data types. The read-only modifier ensures immutability, which is a solid practice. The naming of the properties is clear and follows the camelCase convention. The JSDoc comment provides a clear description of the purpose of the interface, which is helpful for developers. Great work!
36-56: Looks excellent, eh!The
RepositoryandSecretLocationinterfaces are well-structured with relevant properties and data types. The read-only modifier ensures immutability, which is a solid practice. The naming of the properties is clear and follows the camelCase convention. These interfaces provide a clear structure for the data they represent. Awesome job!src/server/webhooks/events/pr/event.ts (3)
1-13: Imports look good, eh!The imports are well-organized and follow a consistent naming convention. They are necessary for defining the
PrEventunion type later in the file.
15-29: ThePrEventunion type is a beauty, don't ya think?The
PrEventunion type is a great way to represent different pull request events. It promotes type safety and makes the code more readable. The JSDoc comment is also a nice touch, eh!
31-44: ThePrEventKeyunion type is a real gem, eh?The
PrEventKeyunion type is a clever way to access theeventKeyproperty of different pull request events. It can be super handy for type-safe event handling based on theeventKey. Good stuff!src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_added.ts (5)
1-9: LGTM!The
Actorinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations.
11-22: LGTM!The
Commentinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice.The use of
unknown[]forcommentsandtasksproperties is acceptable if the structure of these arrays is not known or not relevant in this context.
24-27: LGTM!The
PermittedOperationsinterface looks good. The property names clearly convey the purpose of these permissions, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice.
29-35: LGTM!The
Project,Properties, andRepositoryinterfaces look good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice.Also applies to: 37-39, 56-66
41-54: LGTM!The
RepoCommentAddedinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice.The JSDoc comment provides a clear description of the interface's purpose, which is helpful for understanding the context of this event payload.
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/opened.ts (6)
1-9: Looks good, eh!The
Actorinterface has clear and well-typed properties. The readonly modifier is used appropriately to prevent unintended mutations.
11-16: Looks great, buddy!The
Authorinterface is well-defined with clear and properly typed properties. The relationship with theActorinterface is established correctly.
18-20: Could you clarify the purpose and structure of theLinksinterface, please?The
selfproperty being an array of typenullseems unusual. It's unclear why it's an array and how it's intended to be used. Could you provide more context or consider simplifying the structure if appropriate?
22-29: Looks fantastic, eh!The
PROpenedinterface captures the essential details of a pull request opened event. The properties are well-typed, and the relationships with other interfaces are established correctly.
31-37: Looks great, buddy!The
Projectinterface has a clear and concise structure. The properties are well-typed and cover the essential details of a project.
58-75: Looks fantastic, buddy!The
RefandRepositoryinterfaces are well-structured and capture the essential details of references and repositories. The properties are properly typed, and the relationships between the interfaces are established correctly.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_edited.ts (4)
1-9: Looks good, eh!The
Actorinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. Marking all properties as readonly is a great way to ensure immutability.
24-27: Spot on!The
PermittedOperationsinterface is a perfect fit for representing the permissions on a comment. The boolean propertiesdeletableandeditableclearly convey the purpose of each permission. Marking them as readonly is a nice touch to ensure immutability.
29-35: These interfaces are top-notch!The
Project,Properties, andRepositoryinterfaces are all well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate data types, and readonly modifiers. They provide a clear and structured representation of their respective objects.Great job on maintaining consistency and ensuring immutability across these interfaces!
Also applies to: 37-39, 58-68
41-56: This interface is a beauty, eh!The
RepoCommentEditedinterface is exceptionally well-defined. The property names are clear and descriptive, and the use of other interfaces likeActor,Comment, andRepositoryprovides a structured representation of the payload.The JSDoc comment is a fantastic addition, providing a concise description of the interface's purpose and the associated event key. It enhances the code's readability and makes it easier for other developers to understand.
Moreover, using a string literal type for the
eventKeyproperty is a brilliant move. It ensures that only the exact event key"repo:comment:edited"can be assigned, preventing any potential typos or inconsistencies.Excellent work on this interface!
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/deleted.ts (5)
1-9: LGTM!The
Actorinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations.
11-16: LGTM!The
Authorinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations. Nice job reusing theActorinterface for theuserproperty.
18-27: LGTM!The
PRDeletedinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations. Nice job reusing theActorandPullRequestinterfaces for theactorandpullRequestproperties respectively. The doc comment provides a clear explanation of the interface's purpose.
29-35: LGTM!The
Projectinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations.
55-72: LGTM!The
RefandRepositoryinterfaces look good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations. Nice job reusing theRepositoryandProjectinterfaces for therepositoryandprojectproperties respectively.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/declined.ts (6)
1-9: Looks good, eh!The
Actorinterface has clear and descriptive property names. Making all properties read-only is a solid practice to prevent unintended mutations.
11-16: Looks great, eh!The
Authorinterface has clear and descriptive property names. Making all properties read-only is a solid practice to prevent unintended mutations. Using theActortype for theuserproperty promotes code reuse and maintains consistency.
18-27: Looks fantastic, eh!The
PRDeclinedinterface is well-documented and has clear and descriptive property names. Making all properties read-only is a solid practice to prevent unintended mutations. Using theActortype for theactorproperty and thePullRequesttype for thepullRequestproperty promotes code reuse and maintains consistency.
29-35: Looks great, eh!The
Projectinterface has clear and descriptive property names. Making all properties read-only is a solid practice to prevent unintended mutations.
56-61: Looks great, eh!The
Refinterface has clear and descriptive property names. Making all properties read-only is a solid practice to prevent unintended mutations. Using theRepositorytype for therepositoryproperty promotes code reuse and maintains consistency.
63-73: Looks great, eh!The
Repositoryinterface has clear and descriptive property names. Making all properties read-only is a solid practice to prevent unintended mutations. Using theProjecttype for theprojectproperty promotes code reuse and maintains consistency.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/merged.ts (8)
1-9: LGTM!The
Actorinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations.
11-16: LGTM!The
Authorinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations. The composition of theActorinterface for theuserproperty is also a good design choice.
18-21: LGTM!The
MergeCommitinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations.
25-32: LGTM!The
PRMergedinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations. The composition of theActorandPullRequestinterfaces is also a good design choice. The comment above the interface provides good documentation about the event key and the payload.
34-40: LGTM!The
Projectinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations.
42-44: LGTM!The
Propertiesinterface looks good. The use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations. The composition of theMergeCommitinterface is also a good design choice.
66-71: LGTM!The
Refinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations. The composition of theRepositoryinterface is also a good design choice.
73-83: LGTM!The
Repositoryinterface looks good. The property names are descriptive, and the use ofreadonlyis a good practice to prevent accidental mutations. The composition of theProjectinterface is also a good design choice.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_changes_requested.ts (3)
1-9: LGTM!The
Actorinterface looks good with its readonly properties and descriptive names. The mix of data types is appropriate for representing an actor.
13-24: LGTM!The
PRReviewerChangesRequestedinterface looks good. The property types seem appropriate, and the use of the string literal type foreventKeyis a nice touch to restrict the possible values.
26-32: LGTM!The
Participantinterface looks good. The property types are appropriate, and the optionallastReviewedCommitproperty is handled correctly.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_deleted.ts (5)
1-9: LGTM!The
Actorinterface is well-defined with clear and descriptive property names, appropriate types, andreadonlymodifiers to ensure immutability. Great job!
11-16: LGTM!The
Authorinterface is well-defined with clear and descriptive property names, appropriate types, andreadonlymodifiers to ensure immutability. The use of theActorinterface for theuserproperty promotes code reuse and modularity. Great job!
31-42: LGTM!The
PRCommentDeletedinterface is well-defined with clear and descriptive property names, appropriate types, andreadonlymodifiers to ensure immutability. The use of theActor,Comment, andPullRequestinterfaces for the corresponding properties promotes code reuse and modularity.The interface is also well-documented with a clear description of its purpose and the event key it corresponds to, which improves code readability and maintainability. Great job!
44-50: LGTM!The
Projectinterface is well-defined with clear and descriptive property names, appropriate types, andreadonlymodifiers to ensure immutability. Great job!
70-87: LGTM!The
RefandRepositoryinterfaces are well-defined with clear and descriptive property names, appropriate types, andreadonlymodifiers to ensure immutability. The use of theRepositoryinterface for therepositoryproperty in theRefinterface and theProjectinterface for theprojectproperty in theRepositoryinterface promotes code reuse and modularity. Great job!src/server/webhooks/events/pr/from_ref_updated.ts (7)
1-10: LGTM!The
Actorinterface looks good. The read-only properties cover essential details about an actor, and the naming is clear and concise.
12-14: LGTM!The
ActorLinksinterface looks good. The read-onlyselfproperty likely represents a list of URLs related to the actor, and the naming is clear and concise.
16-21: LGTM!The
Authorinterface looks good. The read-only properties cover essential details about an author, and the naming is clear and concise.
23-26: LGTM!The
Cloneinterface looks good. The read-only propertieshrefandnamelikely represent the URL and name of the clone, respectively, and the naming is clear and concise.
28-37: LGTM!The
PRFromRefUpdatedinterface looks good. The read-only properties cover essential details about a pull request from ref updated event, and the naming is clear and concise. The JSDoc comments provide additional context for some of the properties, which is helpful for developers using this interface.
39-46: LGTM!The
Projectinterface looks good. The read-only properties cover essential details about a project, and the naming is clear and concise.
67-95: LGTM!The
Ref,Repository,RepositoryLinks, andSelfinterfaces all look good. The read-only properties in each interface cover essential details about their respective objects, and the naming is clear and concise.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/modified.ts (5)
1-9: LGTM!The
Actorinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to ensure immutability.
11-16: LGTM!The
Authorinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, read-only modifiers, and a nestedActorobject to promote code reuse and modularity.
34-40: LGTM!The
PreviousTargetinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to ensure immutability.
42-48: LGTM!The
Projectinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, read-only modifiers, and a nestedActorobject to promote code reuse and modularity.
69-86: LGTM!The
RefandRepositoryinterfaces are well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, read-only modifiers, and nested objects to promote code reuse and modularity.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_added.ts (6)
1-9: LGTM!The
Actorinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to prevent accidental mutations. Great job following best practices!
11-16: LGTM!The
Authorinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to prevent accidental mutations. Theuserproperty is correctly typed asActor, promoting type safety and code reusability. Great job following best practices!
30-42: LGTM!The
PRCommentAddedinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to prevent accidental mutations. Theactor,comment, andpullRequestproperties are correctly typed asActor,Comment, andPullRequestrespectively, promoting type safety and code reusability. The interface also has a descriptive JSDoc comment, which is great for documentation and code readability. Great job following best practices!
44-50: LGTM!The
Projectinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to prevent accidental mutations. Great job following best practices!
52-54: LGTM!The
Propertiesinterface is well-defined with a descriptive property name, appropriate type, and read-only modifier to prevent accidental mutations. Great job following best practices!
74-91: LGTM!The
RefandRepositoryinterfaces are well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to prevent accidental mutations. The properties that are of types defined in this file, such asProjectandRepository, promote type safety and code reusability. Great job following best practices!src/server/webhooks/events/repo/synchronized.ts (8)
1-7: LGTM, eh!The
Changeinterface looks good. The properties are well-defined, and the use ofreadonlyensures immutability. The naming and types are also appropriate.
9-12: Beauty, eh!The
Cloneinterface is spot on. Thehrefandnameproperties are well-defined, and the use ofreadonlyis a nice touch.
14-17: Looks great, eh!The
Linksinterface is well-structured. Thecloneandselfproperties are correctly typed as arrays of their respective interfaces. Thereadonlymodifier is also used consistently.
21-43: Solid work, eh!The
MirrorRepoSynchronizedinterface is very well-defined. The properties are comprehensive and cover all the necessary data for a mirror repo synchronized event. The use of separate interfaces for complex types keeps things clean and modular. The comments are also very helpful in understanding the purpose and details of each property. Great job!
45-48: Looks good, eh!The
MirrorServerinterface is simple and straightforward. Theidandnameproperties are well-defined, and the use ofreadonlyis consistent with the rest of the code.
50-56: Nice one, eh!The
Projectinterface looks great. The properties cover all the essential data points for a project, and the use ofreadonlyensures immutability. The naming and types are also spot on.
58-62: Looks great, eh!The
Refinterface is well-defined. ThedisplayId,id, andtypeproperties cover the necessary data for a ref object. The use ofreadonlyis also consistent with the rest of the code.
64-78: Excellent work, eh!The
Repositoryinterface is very comprehensive. It covers all the essential data points for a repository, including thelinksandprojectproperties, which are well-typed with their respective interfaces. The use ofreadonlyensures immutability, and the comments for thelinksproperty provide helpful context. Great job!src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_edited.ts (3)
1-9: LGTM!The
Actorinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to ensure immutability.
11-16: LGTM!The
Authorinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to ensure immutability. Theuserproperty is correctly typed asActor, promoting type safety and code reuse.
30-44: LGTM!The
PRCommentEditedinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names, appropriate types, and read-only modifiers to ensure immutability. Theactor,comment, andpullRequestproperties are correctly typed, promoting type safety and code reuse. The descriptive comment explaining the event key improves code readability and understanding.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/refs_changed.ts (10)
1-9: LGTM!The
Actorinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. The use ofreadonlyfor all properties is a good practice.
11-14: LGTM!The
Authorinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. The use ofreadonlyfor all properties is a good practice.
16-22: LGTM!The
Changeinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. The use ofreadonlyfor all properties is a good practice. The interface also correctly references theRefinterface.
24-33: LGTM!The
Commitinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. The use ofreadonlyfor all properties is a good practice. The interface also correctly references theAuthorandParentinterfaces.
35-38: LGTM!The
Parentinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. The use ofreadonlyfor all properties is a good practice.
40-47: LGTM!The
Projectinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. The use ofreadonlyfor all properties is a good practice.
49-53: LGTM!The
Refinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. The use ofreadonlyfor all properties is a good practice.
57-75: LGTM!The
RepoRefsChangedinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. The use ofreadonlyfor all properties is a good practice. The interface also correctly references other interfaces and uses a literal type for theeventKeyproperty, which is a good practice for defining event types.
77-89: LGTM!The
Repositoryinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. The use ofreadonlyfor all properties is a good practice. The interface also correctly references theProjectinterface.
91-100: LGTM!The
ToCommitinterface is well-defined with descriptive property names and appropriate data types. The use ofreadonlyfor all properties is a good practice. The interface also correctly references theAuthorandCommitinterfaces.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_approved.ts (1)
12-12: Verify the type ofselfinLinksinterfaceThe
selfproperty in theLinksinterface is currently typed asnull[], which seems unusual. Shouldselfbe of a different type, such as an array of link objects or a more specific type? Please verify the correct type for this property.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation