✨ Use a real event to update PRReviewerUpdated #8
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request implements updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_changes_requested.ts (1)
52-52: Excellent type safety improvement, eh!The change from
unknown[]toParticipant[]for theparticipantsproperty is a great improvement. It enhances type safety and aligns well with thereviewersproperty.For consistency, consider adding a brief comment above both
participantsandreviewersproperties to clarify their roles, similar to other properties in this interface.Here's a suggested improvement:
+ /** List of participants involved in the pull request. */ readonly participants: Participant[] + /** List of reviewers assigned to the pull request. */ readonly reviewers: Participant[]src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_deleted.ts (1)
61-62: Excellent improvement in type safety!The change from
unknown[]toAuthor[]for bothparticipantsandreviewersproperties significantly enhances type safety and code clarity. This modification will provide better IDE support and make the code more self-documenting.To further improve code maintainability, consider creating a custom type for these properties:
type PRParticipant = Author; export interface PullRequest { // ... other properties readonly participants: PRParticipant[]; readonly reviewers: PRParticipant[]; // ... remaining properties }This approach allows for easier future extensions specific to pull request participants without modifying the base
Authorinterface.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_added.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_deleted.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_edited.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/declined.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/deleted.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/from_ref_updated.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/merged.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/modified.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/opened.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_approved.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_changes_requested.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_unapproved.ts (1 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_updated.ts (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/opened.ts (1)
49-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImproved type safety for participants and reviewers. Excellent work!
The change from
unknown[]toAuthor[]for bothparticipantsandreviewersproperties significantly enhances type safety and code clarity. This modification aligns well with theauthorproperty and provides better structure to thePullRequestinterface.However, I have a small suggestion to further improve the code:
Consider creating a more specific type for
participants, as theapprovedproperty in theAuthorinterface might not be applicable to all participants. For example:export interface Participant extends Omit<Author, 'approved'> {} export interface PullRequest { // ... other properties readonly participants: Participant[] readonly reviewers: Author[] // ... other properties }This change would make the types more precise and prevent potential misuse of the
approvedproperty for participants who may not have approval status.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please run the following script:
This will help identify any places in the codebase that might need updates due to the type changes.
✅ Verification successful
[/run_scripts]
[/run_scripts]
Verification Successful: No usages of
participantsandreviewersfound elsewhere.The changes from
unknown[]toAuthor[]for theparticipantsandreviewersproperties have been verified. No usages of these properties were found in the codebase, confirming that the type changes are safe and do not affect other parts of the application.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of PullRequest.participants and PullRequest.reviewers # Test: Search for usages of participants and reviewers echo "Usages of PullRequest.participants:" rg --type typescript "PullRequest.*participants" -A 3 -B 3 echo "\nUsages of PullRequest.reviewers:" rg --type typescript "PullRequest.*reviewers" -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 348
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of PullRequest.participants and PullRequest.reviewers # Test: Search for usages of participants and reviewers without specifying file type echo "Usages of PullRequest.participants:" rg "PullRequest.*participants" -A 3 -B 3 echo "\nUsages of PullRequest.reviewers:" rg "PullRequest.*reviewers" -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 242
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for direct usages of PullRequest.participants and PullRequest.reviewers using property access patterns echo "Searching for '.participants' usages:" rg "\.participants\b" -A 3 -B 3 echo "\nSearching for '.reviewers' usages:" rg "\.reviewers\b" -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 9784
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/declined.ts (1)
47-48: Improved type safety for participants and reviewersThe change from
unknown[]toAuthor[]for bothparticipantsandreviewersproperties is a positive improvement. It enhances type safety, code readability, and IDE support.However, please consider the following:
- Ensure that this change doesn't break any existing code that might have relied on the flexibility of
unknown[].- Verify that all participants and reviewers will always conform to the
Authorinterface structure in all scenarios.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's check for any other occurrences of
participantsorreviewersthat might need similar updates:✅ Verification successful
Type changes for participants and reviewers verified successfully
All instances of
participantsandreviewershave been updated fromunknown[]to specific types (Author[]orParticipant[]) across the codebase. No remainingunknown[]types were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other occurrences of participants or reviewers that might need updating # Test: Search for participants or reviewers with unknown[] type rg --type typescript 'participants: unknown\[\]|reviewers: unknown\[\]' # Test: Search for participants or reviewers usage to ensure compatibility rg --type typescript '\b(participants|reviewers)\b'Length of output: 197
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other occurrences of participants or reviewers that might need updating # Test: Search for participants or reviewers with unknown[] type rg --type ts 'participants: unknown\[\]|reviewers: unknown\[\]' # Test: Search for participants or reviewers usage to ensure compatibility rg --type ts '\b(participants|reviewers)\b'Length of output: 15014
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/merged.ts (1)
58-58: Approved: Type safety improvement for reviewersThe change from
unknown[]toAuthor[]for thereviewersproperty enhances type safety and consistency within thePullRequestinterface. This modification aligns well with theparticipantsproperty, which also uses theAuthor[]type.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any breaking changes, please run the following script to verify its usage across the codebase:
This script will help identify any potential areas that might need updating due to this type change.
✅ Verification successful
To address the issue with the previous script, please run the following updated script to accurately verify the usage of
PullRequest.reviewersand check for any remaining instances ofunknown[]in TypeScript files:
Verified: No issues found with reviewers type change
The update from
unknown[]toAuthor[]for thereviewersproperty in thePullRequestinterface has been successfully verified. There are no additional usages ofPullRequest.reviewersacross the codebase, ensuring that this change is isolated and does not introduce any breaking changes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of PullRequest.reviewers across the codebase # Search for usage of PullRequest.reviewers echo "Searching for usage of PullRequest.reviewers:" rg --type typescript -A 5 'PullRequest.*reviewers' # Search for any remaining instances of unknown[] type echo "Searching for any remaining instances of unknown[] type:" rg --type typescript 'unknown\[\]'Length of output: 383
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of PullRequest.reviewers across the codebase # Search for usage of PullRequest.reviewers echo "Searching for usage of PullRequest.reviewers:" rg 'PullRequest.*reviewers' --glob '*.ts' -A 5 # Search for any remaining instances of unknown[] type echo "Searching for any remaining instances of unknown[] type:" rg 'unknown\[\]' --glob '*.ts'Length of output: 1161
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_unapproved.ts (1)
52-52: Improved type safety forparticipantspropertyThe change from
unknown[]toParticipant[]for theparticipantsproperty in thePullRequestinterface is a positive improvement. This update enhances type safety and provides better clarity about the structure of the data.Some additional observations:
- This change aligns well with the
reviewersproperty, which is also of typeParticipant[].- It's consistent with the
Participantinterface defined earlier in the file.- This update will likely improve developer experience by providing better autocomplete and type checking capabilities.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify if similar changes have been made in other files:
This script will help us identify any inconsistencies in the
PullRequestinterface definitions across the codebase, ensuring that theparticipantsproperty has been updated uniformly.src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_changes_requested.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-85: Well-structured and consistent interfaces, good job!The overall structure of the interfaces in this file is well-designed and consistent. The relationships between
PRReviewerChangesRequested,PullRequest,Participant, andActorinterfaces are clear and logical.The
PRReviewerChangesRequestedinterface provides a comprehensive representation of the "Changes requested" event, including all necessary details about the actor, participant, and pull request.Keep up the good work in maintaining clear and consistent type definitions!
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_approved.ts (1)
57-57: Improved type safety for theparticipantsproperty.The change from
unknown[]toParticipant[]for theparticipantsproperty in thePullRequestinterface is a good improvement. It enhances type safety and consistency, aligning with thereviewersproperty which also usesParticipant[].To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues elsewhere in the codebase, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any potential areas that might need updating due to this type change.
✅ Verification successful
Verification successful: No issues found related to the type change of the
participantsproperty.The change from
unknown[]toParticipant[]for theparticipantsproperty in thePullRequestinterface does not introduce any issues elsewhere in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any usage of PullRequest.participants that might be affected by the type change # Search for usage of PullRequest.participants echo "Searching for usage of PullRequest.participants:" rg --type typescript "PullRequest.*participants" --glob '!src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_approved.ts' # Search for any assignments to PullRequest.participants echo "Searching for assignments to PullRequest.participants:" rg --type typescript "participants\s*[:=]" --glob '!src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_approved.ts'Length of output: 513
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any usage of PullRequest.participants that might be affected by the type change # Search for usage of PullRequest.participants echo "Searching for usage of PullRequest.participants:" rg "PullRequest\.*participants" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' --glob '!src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_approved.ts' # Search for any assignments to PullRequest.participants echo "Searching for assignments to PullRequest.participants:" rg "participants\s*[:=]" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' --glob '!src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_approved.ts'Length of output: 1434
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/from_ref_updated.ts (1)
58-59: Approved: Enhanced type safety for participants and reviewersThe change from
unknown[]toAuthor[]for bothparticipantsandreviewersproperties is a significant improvement. It enhances type safety and provides better clarity about the structure of these arrays.This change aligns well with TypeScript best practices by using more specific types instead of
unknown. It will likely lead to better code completion and type checking throughout the codebase.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to verify that all usages of
PullRequest.participantsandPullRequest.reviewersare compatible with the newAuthor[]type:Please review the output to ensure that all usages are compatible with the new
Author[]type. If any incompatibilities are found, they should be addressed to maintain consistency with this change.✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Re-verify usage of
PullRequest.participantsandPullRequest.reviewersThe previous script failed to recognize the
typescriptfile type. Please run the updated script below to verify the usages:
Action Required: Further Verification of
PullRequest.participantsandPullRequest.reviewersUsagesThe previous script did not find any usages of
PullRequest.participantsandPullRequest.reviewers. To ensure comprehensive verification, please run the updated script below, which performs a broader search without restricting the file type:This script searches for both
participantsandreviewersproperties within any context. After executing, please review the output to confirm that all usages are compatible with the updatedAuthor[]type.
Verification Successful: No Usages Found for
PullRequest.participantsandPullRequest.reviewersThe verification scripts did not find any usages of
PullRequest.participantsorPullRequest.reviewerswithin the codebase. This confirms that changing their type toAuthor[]poses no compatibility issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of PullRequest.participants and PullRequest.reviewers # Search for usages of PullRequest.participants echo "Usages of PullRequest.participants:" rg --type typescript -A 3 "PullRequest.*\.participants" echo "\nUsages of PullRequest.reviewers:" rg --type typescript -A 3 "PullRequest.*\.reviewers"Length of output: 342
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of PullRequest.participants and PullRequest.reviewers # Search for usages of PullRequest.participants echo "Usages of PullRequest.participants:" rg --type ts -A 3 "PullRequest.*\.participants" echo "\nUsages of PullRequest.reviewers:" rg --type ts -A 3 "PullRequest.*\.reviewers"Length of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive verification of PullRequest.participants and PullRequest.reviewers usages # Search for usages of PullRequest.participants echo "Usages of PullRequest.participants:" rg "PullRequest\.(participants|reviewers)" -A 3Length of output: 130
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/modified.ts (1)
60-60: Improved type safety forparticipantspropertyThe change from
unknown[]toAuthor[]for theparticipantsproperty enhances type safety and clarity. This modification aligns well with theAuthorinterface defined earlier in the file, ensuring that each participant object has the expected structure.However, there are a couple of points to consider:
Consistency: The
reviewersproperty on the next line is also of typeAuthor[]. This consistency is good, but it might be worth considering ifParticipantwould be a more appropriate name for the interface, given its usage here.Backwards compatibility: Ensure that this change doesn't break any existing code that might be expecting
unknown[]. If this is a breaking change, it should be properly documented and versioned.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's check for any other occurrences of
participantsorreviewersthat might need updating:✅ Verification successful
Consistent use of
Author[]type forparticipantsandreviewersAll instances of the
participantsandreviewersproperties across the codebase are correctly typed asAuthor[], ensuring enhanced type safety and consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other occurrences of participants or reviewers in the codebase # Expected result: Consistent usage of Author[] type for participants and reviewers echo "Searching for 'participants' occurrences:" rg --type typescript 'participants.*:' -g '!modified.ts' echo "\nSearching for 'reviewers' occurrences:" rg --type typescript 'reviewers.*:' -g '!modified.ts'Length of output: 380
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for occurrences of 'participants' and 'reviewers' property declarations in TypeScript files # Expected result: List all instances to verify consistent use of Author[] type echo "Searching for 'participants' property declarations:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'PropertySignature: identifier @name "participants" : $_' . echo "\nSearching for 'reviewers' property declarations:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'PropertySignature: identifier @name "reviewers" : $_' .Length of output: 1383
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for occurrences of 'participants' and 'reviewers' property declarations in TypeScript files using file globs # Expected result: List all instances to verify consistent use of Author[] type echo "Searching for 'participants' property declarations in .ts and .tsx files:" rg 'participants\s*:\s*Author\[\]' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' echo "\nSearching for 'reviewers' property declarations in .ts and .tsx files:" rg 'reviewers\s*:\s*Author\[\]' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 1980
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_added.ts (1)
90-91: Improved type safety for participants and reviewers.The change from
unknown[]toAuthor[]for bothparticipantsandreviewersproperties enhances type safety and clarity. This modification aligns well with theAuthorinterface defined earlier in the file, providing a more precise structure for these arrays.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to verify that all usages of
PullRequest.participantsandPullRequest.reviewersare compatible with the newAuthor[]type:This will help identify any potential areas that might need updates due to this type change.
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_edited.ts (1)
92-93: Excellent type refinement for improved safety and clarity.The change from
unknown[]toAuthor[]for bothparticipantsandreviewersproperties is a significant improvement. It enhances type safety, code readability, and enables better IDE support.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to verify that all usages of these properties have been updated accordingly:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: All usages of
participantsandreviewershave been correctly updated toAuthor[].No issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of participants and reviewers properties in PullRequest interface # Test: Search for usages of participants and reviewers. Expect: Only occurrences of Author[] type. rg --type typescript -e 'participants:.*Author\[\]' -e 'reviewers:.*Author\[\]' src/Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of participants and reviewers properties in PullRequest interface # Test: Search for usages of participants and reviewers. Expect: Only occurrences of Author[] type. rg --type ts -e 'participants:.*Author\[\]' -e 'reviewers:.*Author\[\]' src/Length of output: 1606
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_updated.ts (13)
1-7: Appropriate addition of necessary importsThe added imports from
"../../../openapi/openapi-typescript.js"are required for the referenced types and are correctly used.
14-14: Addition oflinksproperty toActorinterfaceIntroducing
links: ActorLinksto theActorinterface correctly includes the links associated with an actor.
17-17: Update oftypeproperty inActorinterfaceUpdating
typetoSchemaApplicationUser["type"]aligns theActorinterface with the schema definition.
20-21: Definition ofActorLinksinterfaceThe
ActorLinksinterface is appropriately defined with aselfproperty of typeSelf[].
31-34: Definition ofCloneinterfaceThe
Cloneinterface is properly defined to represent the clone links withhrefandnameproperties.
54-56: Addition ofownerproperty and update oftypeinProjectinterfaceThe optional
owner?: Actorproperty is appropriately added, and updatingtypetoSchemaProject["type"]ensures consistency with the schema.
70-70: Definition ofparticipantsandreviewerspropertiesThe
participantsandreviewersproperties are correctly defined asAuthor[], improving type clarity.
72-72: Update ofstateproperty inPullRequestinterfaceChanging
statetoSchemaPullRequest["state"]aligns thePullRequestinterface with the schema definition.
84-84: Addition oftypeproperty toRefinterfaceThe
type: SchemaRestMinimalRef["type"]property is correctly added to theRefinterface.
88-88: Enhancements toRepositoryinterfaceThe addition of
archived: boolean,hierarchyId: string, andlinks: RepositoryLinksproperties to theRepositoryinterface appropriately enriches its representation.Also applies to: 90-90, 92-92
98-98: Update ofstateproperty inRepositoryinterfaceThe
stateproperty is updated toSchemaRepository["state"], which maintains consistency with the schema.
102-105: Definition ofRepositoryLinksinterfaceThe
RepositoryLinksinterface is correctly defined withcloneandselfproperties to represent repository links.
107-109: Definition ofSelfinterfaceThe
Selfinterface is appropriately defined with anhrefproperty.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/server/webhooks/events/repo/secret_detected.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-58: Consider applying similar type refinements to other interfaces.The improvement made to the
Repositoryinterface is excellent. To further enhance type safety across the file, consider applying similar refinements to other interfaces where applicable. For example:
- The
Actorinterface might benefit from more specific types for properties liketypeorlocale.- The
Projectinterface could potentially use more specific types fortypeandkey.- The
RepoSecretDetectedinterface'seventKeyproperty could be typed as a literal"repo:secret_detected"for added type safety.These suggestions aim to maintain consistency and further improve type safety throughout the file.
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_edited.ts (3)
45-45: LGTM: Improved type safety for thestateproperty.The change from
stringtoSchemaComment["state"]enhances type safety and ensures consistency with the OpenAPI schema. This is a good practice for maintaining a robust type system.Consider adding a comment explaining the possible values of
SchemaComment["state"]for better code readability. For example:/** Possible values: 'OPEN', 'RESOLVED', 'REOPENED' */ readonly state: SchemaComment["state"]
94-96: Great improvements to type safety in thePullRequestinterface!The changes from
unknown[]toAuthor[]forparticipantsandreviewerssignificantly enhance type safety and code clarity. The update toSchemaPullRequest["state"]for thestateproperty is consistent with the approach used elsewhere and improves type specificity.Consider adding comments to explain the possible values for
SchemaPullRequest["state"], similar to the suggestion for theCommentinterface. This would improve code readability and maintainability.
Line range hint
124-124: LGTM: Consistent improvement in type safety for theRepositoryinterface.The change from
stringtoSchemaRepository["state"]for thestateproperty is consistent with the improvements made in other interfaces. This enhances type safety and maintains consistency across the codebase.As suggested for other interfaces, consider adding a comment to explain the possible values of
SchemaRepository["state"]for improved code readability and maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_added.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_deleted.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_edited.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/declined.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/deleted.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/from_ref_updated.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/merged.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/modified.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/opened.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_approved.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_changes_requested.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_unapproved.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_added.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_deleted.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_edited.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/forked.ts (3 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/modified.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/refs_changed.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/secret_detected.ts (2 hunks)
- src/server/webhooks/events/repo/synchronized.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (11)
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_added.ts
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_deleted.ts
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/declined.ts
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/deleted.ts
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/from_ref_updated.ts
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/merged.ts
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/modified.ts
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/opened.ts
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_approved.ts
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_changes_requested.ts
- src/server/webhooks/events/pr/reviewer_unapproved.ts
🔇 Additional comments (20)
src/server/webhooks/events/repo/modified.ts (2)
1-1: Good addition of the SchemaRepository import.The import of
SchemaRepositoryfrom the OpenAPI definitions file is a positive change. It promotes type safety and consistency by using standardized schemas for the repository state.
42-42: Excellent type refinement for the 'state' property.The change from
stringtoSchemaRepository["state"]for thestateproperty is a great improvement. It enhances type safety and ensures that only valid states defined in the OpenAPI schema can be assigned.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please run the following script to check for any incompatibilities:
This script will help identify any places in the codebase where the
Repositoryinterface is used, specifically focusing on thestateproperty. It will also look for any direct string assignments to repository state, which might now be incompatible with the new type.src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_deleted.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement added for SchemaRepositoryThe import statement for
SchemaRepositoryfrom the OpenAPI TypeScript definitions is correctly added. This import is necessary for the type change in theRepositoryinterface, enhancing type safety and consistency.
55-55: Approved: Enhanced type safety for Repository stateThe modification of the
stateproperty type fromstringtoSchemaRepository["state"]in theRepositoryinterface is a good improvement. This change enhances type safety and aligns the interface with the OpenAPI schema definition.To ensure consistency, let's verify if similar changes have been applied to other interfaces using the
stateproperty:✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete: No additional
stateproperty modifications requiredNo other occurrences of
readonly state: stringwere found in the codebase. The interface modification is consistent and enhances type safety as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of 'state' properties that might need similar updates # Search for 'state' properties in TypeScript files rg --type typescript 'readonly state: string' srcLength of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of 'state' properties that might need similar updates # Search for 'readonly state: string' in all files under src rg 'readonly state: string' srcLength of output: 33
src/server/webhooks/events/repo/forked.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement added for SchemaRepositoryThe import statement for
SchemaRepositoryhas been correctly added. This import is necessary for the type changes made in theOriginandRepositoryinterfaces.
Line range hint
1-56: Summary: Improved type safety for state propertiesThe changes in this file consistently update the
stateproperty in both theOriginandRepositoryinterfaces to useSchemaRepository["state"]instead ofstring. This enhancement:
- Improves type safety by ensuring the
stateproperty aligns with the OpenAPI schema.- Increases consistency between the TypeScript interfaces and the API schema.
- May require minor updates in code that uses these interfaces, but the impact should be minimal.
These changes represent a positive step towards more robust and maintainable code.
21-21: Approved: Enhanced type safety for Origin.stateThe change from
stringtoSchemaRepository["state"]for thestateproperty in theOrigininterface improves type safety and ensures consistency with the API schema. This is a positive change that will help prevent potential type-related errors.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please run the following script to check for any usage of
Origin.statethat might need updating:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of Origin.state that might need updating # Search for usage of Origin.state rg --type typescript "Origin.*\.state" -g '!src/server/webhooks/events/repo/forked.ts'
56-56: Approved: Enhanced type safety for Repository.stateThe change from
stringtoSchemaRepository["state"]for thestateproperty in theRepositoryinterface is consistent with the change made to theOrigininterface. This improvement in type safety and schema consistency is commendable.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please run the following script to check for any usage of
Repository.statethat might need updating:src/server/webhooks/events/repo/secret_detected.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement added for enhanced type safety.The import of
SchemaRepositoryfrom the OpenAPI TypeScript definitions is a good addition. It allows for more precise typing and better alignment with the API schema.
48-48: Excellent type refinement for thestateproperty.The change from
stringtoSchemaRepository["state"]for thestateproperty in theRepositoryinterface is a great improvement. It enhances type safety and ensures alignment with the API schema.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to verify the usage of the
Repositoryinterface across the codebase:This script will help identify any areas that might need updates due to the changed
stateproperty type.✅ Verification successful
Please update the verification scripts to correctly target TypeScript files. Here are the revised scripts:
Alternatively, if the
--type tsflag still causes issues, you can use the glob pattern approach:
Verification successful: The change to the
stateproperty in theRepositoryinterface does not impact other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential issues with the updated Repository interface # Search for uses of the Repository interface echo "Searching for uses of the Repository interface:" rg --type typescript "Repository\s*[:{]" -g '!**/secret_detected.ts' # Search for direct access to the state property echo "Searching for direct access to the state property of Repository:" rg --type typescript "Repository.*\.state" -g '!**/secret_detected.ts'Length of output: 457
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential issues with the updated Repository interface # Search for uses of the Repository interface echo "Searching for uses of the Repository interface:" rg --type ts "Repository\s*[:{]" -g '!**/secret_detected.ts' # Search for direct access to the state property echo "Searching for direct access to the state property of Repository:" rg --type ts "Repository.*\.state" -g '!**/secret_detected.ts'Length of output: 4218
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential issues with the updated Repository interface # Search for uses of the Repository interface echo "Searching for uses of the Repository interface:" rg "Repository\s*[:{]" -g '*.ts' -g '!**/secret_detected.ts' # Search for direct access to the state property echo "Searching for direct access to the state property of Repository:" rg "Repository.*\.state" -g '*.ts' -g '!**/secret_detected.ts'Length of output: 4218
src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_added.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement enhances type safety.The import of
SchemaRepositoryfrom the OpenAPI TypeScript definitions is a good practice. It allows for better type checking and consistency with the API schema.
66-66: Excellent type refinement for thestateproperty.The change from
stringtoSchemaRepository["state"]for thestateproperty in theRepositoryinterface is a great improvement. It enhances type safety and ensures consistency with the OpenAPI schema.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify any other occurrences of
state: stringinRepositoryinterfaces that might need similar updates.✅ Verification successful
Type refinement for the
stateproperty has been successfully verified.All instances of
state: stringin theRepositoryinterface have been updated toSchemaRepository["state"], ensuring enhanced type safety and consistency with the OpenAPI schema.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'state: string' in Repository interfaces # Test: Search for 'state: string' in Repository interfaces rg --type typescript 'interface Repository.*\{.*\n.*state: string' srcLength of output: 264
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'state: string' in Repository interfaces with multiline support rg --type typescript --multiline 'interface Repository.*\{.*\n.*state: string' srcLength of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'state: string' in Repository interfaces by targeting .ts files rg -U 'interface Repository\s*\{[^}]*\bstate:\s*string\b' --glob '*.ts' srcLength of output: 77
src/server/webhooks/events/repo/comment_edited.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Good use of type import.The import of
SchemaRepositorytype is well-structured and follows good practices by importing a specific type rather than the entire module.
68-68: Excellent type refinement, but verify usage.The change from
stringtoSchemaRepository["state"]for thestateproperty improves type safety and consistency with the OpenAPI schema. This is a positive improvement.However, it's important to verify that this change doesn't break existing code. Please run the following script to check for any potential issues:
If the script returns any results, please review those occurrences to ensure they're compatible with the new type.
src/server/webhooks/events/repo/synchronized.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement enhances type safetyThe import of
SchemaRepositoryfrom the OpenAPI TypeScript definitions is a good practice. It allows for more precise typing and ensures consistency with the API schema.
78-78: Excellent type refinement, verify usage across codebaseThe change from
stringtoSchemaRepository["state"]for thestateproperty is a great improvement in type safety. It ensures that thestateproperty adheres to the expected structure defined in the OpenAPI types.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please run the following script to verify the usage of
Repository.stateacross the codebase:This script will help identify any potential areas that might need updates due to this type change.
✅ Verification successful
Please run the following script to verify the usage of
Repository.stateacross the codebase:
Excellent type refinement, usage verified across codebase
The change from
stringtoSchemaRepository["state"]for thestateproperty enhances type safety and aligns with the defined schema. No issues were found in the codebase regarding the usage ofRepository.state.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of Repository.state across the codebase # Search for usage of Repository.state echo "Usages of Repository.state:" rg --type typescript "Repository.*state" -g '!**/synchronized.ts' # Search for direct assignments to state property echo "\nDirect assignments to state property:" rg --type typescript "state\s*:\s*['\"]" -g '!**/synchronized.ts'Length of output: 361
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of Repository.state across the codebase # Search for usage of Repository.state in TypeScript files echo "Usages of Repository.state:" rg "Repository\..*state" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" --glob "!**/synchronized.ts" # Search for direct assignments to state property in TypeScript files echo "\nDirect assignments to state property:" rg "state\s*:\s*['\"]" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" --glob "!**/synchronized.ts"Length of output: 408
src/server/webhooks/events/repo/refs_changed.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import of SchemaRepository typeThe import of
SchemaRepositoryfrom the OpenAPI TypeScript definitions is a good practice. It enhances type safety and ensures consistency with the API schema.
89-89: LGTM: Updated state property type in Repository interfaceThe change from
stringtoSchemaRepository["state"]for thestateproperty is a good improvement. It enhances type safety and ensures consistency with the API schema.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any usage of
Repository.statethat might be affected:If the script returns any results, please review those occurrences to ensure they're compatible with the new type.
src/server/webhooks/events/pr/comment_edited.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriately.The new imports for
SchemaComment,SchemaPullRequest, andSchemaRepositoryalign with the type changes in the interfaces. This enhances type safety and consistency across the codebase.Also applies to: 5-5
Line range hint
1-134: Overall excellent improvements to type safety and consistency!The changes in this file significantly enhance type safety and consistency by leveraging more specific types from the OpenAPI schema. These modifications align well with the PR objectives of using real events to update PRReviewerUpdated.
Key improvements:
- Updated import statements to include necessary schema types.
- Refined property types in
Comment,PullRequest, andRepositoryinterfaces.- Changed
unknown[]toAuthor[]for better type information in arrays.These changes will lead to more robust code and fewer potential runtime errors. Great work!
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
AuthororParticipantobjects.Bug Fixes
Documentation