Skip to content

Mark ssp_detector v2026.3.30 as broken#1979

Open
sjg2203 wants to merge 5 commits intoconda-forge:mainfrom
sjg2203:main
Open

Mark ssp_detector v2026.3.30 as broken#1979
sjg2203 wants to merge 5 commits intoconda-forge:mainfrom
sjg2203:main

Conversation

@sjg2203
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sjg2203 sjg2203 commented Apr 1, 2026

Guidelines for marking packages as broken:

  • We prefer to patch the repo data (see here)
    instead of marking packages as broken. This alternative workflow makes environments more reproducible.
  • Packages with requirements/metadata that are too strict but otherwise work are
    not technically broken and should not be marked as such.
  • Packages with missing metadata can be marked as broken on a temporary basis
    but should be patched in the repo data and be marked unbroken later.
  • In some cases where the number of users of a package is small or it is used by
    the maintainers only, we can allow packages to be marked broken more liberally.
  • You can use pixi run find-name {matchspec} to get a list of filenames matching given spec.
  • We (conda-forge/core) try to make a decision on these requests within 24 hours.

What will happen when a package is marked broken?

  • Our bots will add the broken label to the package. The main label will remain on the package and this is normal.
  • Our bots will rebuild our repodata patches to remove this package from the repodata.
  • In a few hours after the anaconda.org CDN picks up the new patches, you will no longer be able to install the package from the main channel.

Checklist:

  • I want to mark a package as broken (or not broken):
    • Added a description of the problem with the package in the PR description.
    • Pinged the team for the package for their input.

Reason

Package version was yanked and removed from pypi: https://pypi.org/project/ssp_detector
close #1976
ping @conda-forge/ssp_detector

Signed-off-by: Simon J Guillot <58807831+sjg2203@users.noreply.github.com>
@sjg2203 sjg2203 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 1, 2026 15:48
@sjg2203
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

sjg2203 commented Apr 2, 2026

@conda-forge/core ready for review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Mark SSp_Detector v2026.3.30 as broken

1 participant