Skip to content

Add x86_64-pc-windows-gnu#280

Open
AntoinePrv wants to merge 2 commits intoconda-forge:mainfrom
AntoinePrv:rust-std-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu
Open

Add x86_64-pc-windows-gnu#280
AntoinePrv wants to merge 2 commits intoconda-forge:mainfrom
AntoinePrv:rust-std-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu

Conversation

@AntoinePrv
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@AntoinePrv AntoinePrv commented Apr 16, 2026

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

Close #261

…6.04.16.08.17.00

Other tools:
- conda-build 26.3.0
- rattler-build 0.62.0
- rattler-build-conda-compat 1.4.13
@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

  • ℹ️ Use of posix package on windows is deprecated. Use m2-base.
  • ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-souschef (grayskull). This parser is not currently used by conda-forge, but may be in the future. We are collecting information to see which recipes are compatible with grayskull.
  • ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-recipe-manager. The recipe can only be automatically migrated to the new v1 format if it is parseable by conda-recipe-manager.

This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/24504462246. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.

@AntoinePrv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

validation results:
  {
    ...
    "noarch/rust-std-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu-1.94.0-unix_0.conda": false,
    ...
  }
  NOTE: Any outputs marked as False are not allowed for this feedstock.
  See https://conda-forge.org/docs/maintainer/infrastructure/#output-validation-and-feedstock-tokens
  for information on how to address this error.

@xhochy @pkgw My understanding is that we need this target for Rust to R packages. What do you think?
If this PR is Ok, I'll move forward with adding an extra recipe output.

@AntoinePrv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I added a feedstock PR output as well to speed things up if the approach is validated.
conda-forge/admin-requests#2028

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Why there is no rust-std-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu package?

2 participants