Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [Security Enhancement]

🚨 Severity: MEDIUM
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: Missing standard HTTP security headers (X-Frame-Options, HSTS, CSP, etc.)
🎯 Impact: Increases risk of clickjacking, MIME sniffing attacks, and downgrade attacks.
πŸ”§ Fix: Added a middleware to src/http-transport.ts that injects these headers on every response.
βœ… Verification: Created a reproduction test case src/repro-security-headers.test.ts (now deleted) that confirmed headers are present and HSTS is correctly skipped for localhost. Existing tests in src/http-transport.test.ts also pass.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 1154938676135276516 started by @davidruzicka

- Add X-Frame-Options: DENY
- Add X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
- Add Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'
- Add Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) with localhost exclusion
- Verify via reproduction test case

This enhances the default security posture of the MCP server against clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and insecure connections.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 29, 2025

Codecov Report

βœ… All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
βœ… All tests successful. No failed tests found.

πŸ“’ Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants