Skip to content

Conversation

@pedrocarvalhodcsa
Copy link
Collaborator

@pedrocarvalhodcsa pedrocarvalhodcsa commented Jan 30, 2026

PR Type

Other


Description

  • Comment out pre-deployment report generation step in GitHub Actions workflow

  • Temporarily disable Lambda invocation for sandbox report creation

  • Reason: Missing IAM policy permissions for report generation operation


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["GitHub Actions Workflow"] -->|"Commented Out"| B["Create Reports Lambda Step"]
  B -->|"Blocked By"| C["Missing IAM Policy"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Configuration changes
deploy-to-test-or-dt.yml
Comment out Lambda report generation step                               

.github/workflows/deploy-to-test-or-dt.yml

  • Commented out the entire 'Create pre-deployment reports in all
    sandboxes' step
  • Step included Lambda invocation with jq payload construction and
    response handling
  • Disabled due to insufficient IAM policy permissions for report
    generation operation
  • All 23 lines of the step converted to comments with '#' prefix
+18/-18 

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

qodo-code-review bot commented Jan 30, 2026

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

  • Update
Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

qodo-code-review bot commented Jan 30, 2026

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
General
Use conditional disabling instead of comments

Replace the commented-out GitHub Actions step with a conditionally disabled step
using if: false for better maintainability.

.github/workflows/deploy-to-test-or-dt.yml [95-112]

-#      - name: Create pre-deployment reports in all sandboxes
-#        run: |
-#          echo "Creating report in all sandboxes before deployment..."
-#          REPORT_TITLE="Before DCSA deployment - $(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S UTC')"
-#          PAYLOAD=$(jq -n \
-#            --arg operation "createReportInAllSandboxes" \
-#            --arg reportTitle "$REPORT_TITLE" \
-#            '{operation: $operation, reportTitle: $reportTitle}')
-#
-#          aws lambda invoke \
-#            --function-name ${{ env.AWS_ENVIRONMENT }}AdminLambda \
-#            --payload "$PAYLOAD" \
-#            --cli-binary-format raw-in-base64-out \
-#            response.json
-#
-#          echo "Lambda response:"
-#          cat response.json | jq '.'
-#          rm response.json
+- name: Create pre-deployment reports in all sandboxes
+  if: false
+  run: |
+    echo "Creating report in all sandboxes before deployment..."
+    REPORT_TITLE="Before DCSA deployment - $(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S UTC')"
+    PAYLOAD=$(jq -n \
+      --arg operation "createReportInAllSandboxes" \
+      --arg reportTitle "$REPORT_TITLE" \
+      '{operation: $operation, reportTitle: $reportTitle}')
 
+    aws lambda invoke \
+      --function-name ${{ env.AWS_ENVIRONMENT }}AdminLambda \
+      --payload "$PAYLOAD" \
+      --cli-binary-format raw-in-base64-out \
+      response.json
+
+    echo "Lambda response:"
+    cat response.json | jq '.'
+    rm response.json
+

[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

__

Why: The suggestion correctly proposes using if: false to disable a GitHub Actions step, which is a cleaner and more maintainable approach than commenting out the code block.

Low
  • Update

@pedrocarvalhodcsa pedrocarvalhodcsa merged commit dda26f7 into test Jan 30, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants