Skip to content

Conversation

@leuhk
Copy link

@leuhk leuhk commented Feb 11, 2026


  • CHANGELOG updated or not needed
  • Documentation updated or not needed
  • Haddocks updated or not needed
  • No new TODOs introduced or explained herafter

v0d1ch and others added 7 commits February 8, 2026 19:10
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
@leuhk leuhk merged commit 7a5388d into master Feb 11, 2026
16 of 17 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

Transaction cost differences

No cost or size differences found

@github-actions
Copy link

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at 2026-02-11 04:28:39.309594605 UTC
Max. memory units 14000000
Max. CPU units 10000000000
Max. tx size (kB) 16384

Script summary

Name Hash Size (Bytes)
νInitial c8a101a5c8ac4816b0dceb59ce31fc2258e387de828f02961d2f2045 2652
νCommit 61458bc2f297fff3cc5df6ac7ab57cefd87763b0b7bd722146a1035c 685
νHead a1442faf26d4ec409e2f62a685c1d4893f8d6bcbaf7bcb59d6fa1340 14599
μHead fd173b993e12103cd734ca6710d364e17120a5eb37a224c64ab2b188* 5284
νDeposit ae01dade3a9c346d5c93ae3ce339412b90a0b8f83f94ec6baa24e30c 1102
  • The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 5836 10.38 3.29 0.51
2 6042 12.23 3.86 0.54
3 6236 14.29 4.51 0.57
5 6641 18.43 5.81 0.63
10 7646 28.90 9.10 0.79
43 14281 98.66 30.82 1.80

Commit transaction costs

This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.

UTxO Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 558 2.44 1.16 0.20
2 743 3.38 1.73 0.22
3 921 4.36 2.33 0.24
5 1283 6.41 3.60 0.28
10 2175 12.13 7.25 0.40
54 10063 98.61 68.52 1.88

CollectCom transaction costs

Parties UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 57 525 25.24 7.32 0.43
2 114 636 34.23 9.85 0.53
3 170 747 40.27 11.70 0.59
4 228 858 52.72 15.10 0.72
5 283 969 61.39 17.57 0.82
6 339 1081 75.78 21.45 0.96
7 397 1192 84.79 24.01 1.06
8 451 1303 94.45 26.69 1.16

Cost of Increment Transaction

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 1813 24.00 7.62 0.48
2 2001 26.46 8.97 0.52
3 2118 28.46 10.18 0.55
5 2404 31.48 12.36 0.60
10 3246 42.62 18.82 0.77
41 7766 99.90 55.39 1.70

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 619 22.53 7.32 0.41
2 726 22.52 7.93 0.42
3 947 27.10 9.90 0.48
5 1155 28.00 11.46 0.51
10 2085 42.29 18.78 0.72
42 6666 98.06 55.66 1.64

Close transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 681 27.47 8.46 0.46
2 875 31.66 10.29 0.52
3 916 32.72 11.23 0.54
5 1251 35.08 13.26 0.58
10 2014 44.85 19.37 0.74
36 6123 98.42 51.77 1.59

Contest transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 675 33.79 10.15 0.53
2 811 35.88 11.39 0.56
3 1057 39.34 13.05 0.61
5 1272 42.53 15.25 0.66
10 2233 56.92 22.67 0.87
30 4921 98.14 47.35 1.50

Abort transaction costs

There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 5803 27.13 9.10 0.69
2 5937 35.88 12.05 0.79
3 5994 40.31 13.45 0.84
4 6163 50.51 16.94 0.95
5 6286 59.12 19.86 1.05
6 6548 73.69 24.79 1.21
7 6761 80.61 27.24 1.30
8 6930 93.76 31.61 1.44

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.

Parties UTxO UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
10 0 0 5834 18.93 6.32 0.61
10 1 57 5869 22.10 7.52 0.64
10 5 284 6003 28.90 10.28 0.72
10 10 571 6175 38.62 14.15 0.84
10 20 1139 6513 59.73 22.44 1.08
10 30 1710 6856 80.48 30.61 1.32
10 39 2222 7161 98.93 37.88 1.54

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2026-02-11 04:28:47.633136677 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 300
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 5.395503100
P99 8.98260561999998ms
P95 6.70078625ms
P50 5.1594975000000005ms
Number of Invalid txs 0

Three local nodes

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 900
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 32.599684647
P99 51.20000236ms
P95 44.1318471ms
P50 31.3598765ms
Number of Invalid txs 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants