Skip to content

Conversation

@leuhk
Copy link

@leuhk leuhk commented Feb 11, 2026


  • CHANGELOG updated or not needed
  • Documentation updated or not needed
  • Haddocks updated or not needed
  • No new TODOs introduced or explained herafter

v0d1ch and others added 8 commits February 8, 2026 19:10
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
@leuhk leuhk merged commit 56781fc into master Feb 11, 2026
15 of 17 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

Transaction cost differences

No cost or size differences found

@github-actions
Copy link

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at 2026-02-11 07:39:52.578580369 UTC
Max. memory units 14000000
Max. CPU units 10000000000
Max. tx size (kB) 16384

Script summary

Name Hash Size (Bytes)
νInitial c8a101a5c8ac4816b0dceb59ce31fc2258e387de828f02961d2f2045 2652
νCommit 61458bc2f297fff3cc5df6ac7ab57cefd87763b0b7bd722146a1035c 685
νHead a1442faf26d4ec409e2f62a685c1d4893f8d6bcbaf7bcb59d6fa1340 14599
μHead fd173b993e12103cd734ca6710d364e17120a5eb37a224c64ab2b188* 5284
νDeposit ae01dade3a9c346d5c93ae3ce339412b90a0b8f83f94ec6baa24e30c 1102
  • The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 5836 10.38 3.29 0.51
2 6035 12.23 3.86 0.54
3 6239 14.50 4.58 0.58
5 6643 18.41 5.80 0.63
10 7647 28.73 9.04 0.78
43 14279 99.33 31.06 1.80

Commit transaction costs

This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.

UTxO Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 558 2.44 1.16 0.20
2 741 3.38 1.73 0.22
3 919 4.36 2.33 0.24
5 1274 6.41 3.60 0.28
10 2170 12.13 7.25 0.40
54 10071 98.61 68.52 1.88

CollectCom transaction costs

Parties UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 57 525 24.42 7.12 0.42
2 114 636 34.27 9.87 0.53
3 170 747 41.38 11.97 0.60
4 225 858 53.30 15.18 0.73
5 283 969 58.30 16.84 0.79
6 339 1081 66.21 19.09 0.87
7 394 1196 72.99 21.19 0.95
8 451 1307 89.38 25.42 1.11
9 507 1414 89.29 25.96 1.12

Cost of Increment Transaction

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 1804 23.92 7.60 0.48
2 2020 26.55 9.00 0.52
3 2122 28.02 10.08 0.54
5 2439 32.19 12.57 0.61
10 3187 41.65 18.55 0.76
40 7639 97.37 54.05 1.66

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 624 22.81 7.37 0.42
2 718 22.60 7.95 0.42
3 853 24.11 9.04 0.45
5 1342 31.00 12.31 0.55
10 2067 41.05 18.45 0.71
40 6402 95.77 53.66 1.59

Close transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 601 28.46 8.69 0.47
2 795 30.95 10.07 0.51
3 950 30.94 10.75 0.52
5 1308 37.81 14.01 0.61
10 1945 44.30 19.18 0.73
35 5680 94.40 49.88 1.52

Contest transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 679 33.87 10.16 0.53
2 803 35.85 11.38 0.56
3 948 38.21 12.71 0.59
5 1351 43.40 15.50 0.67
10 2074 54.99 22.10 0.85
30 4967 98.89 47.57 1.51

Abort transaction costs

There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 5814 27.08 9.08 0.69
2 5927 36.01 12.11 0.79
3 6108 44.72 15.04 0.89
4 6244 52.23 17.57 0.97
5 6398 65.34 22.01 1.12
6 6457 72.47 24.30 1.20
7 6851 86.62 29.37 1.36
8 6852 88.69 29.82 1.38

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.

Parties UTxO UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
10 1 57 5869 21.22 7.21 0.63
10 5 285 6004 29.35 10.43 0.73
10 10 569 6174 39.51 14.45 0.85
10 20 1138 6512 60.17 22.59 1.09
10 30 1708 6855 80.92 30.76 1.33
10 40 2277 7193 99.66 38.24 1.55

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2026-02-11 07:41:34.74722041 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 300
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 5.459799516
P99 8.868247649999988ms
P95 6.703769500000001ms
P50 5.236898ms
Number of Invalid txs 0

Three local nodes

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 900
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 34.374886031
P99 52.983277830000006ms
P95 44.90458544999999ms
P50 33.2269985ms
Number of Invalid txs 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants